by smac » Sun Apr 25, 2010 10:13 pm
by purch » Sun Apr 25, 2010 10:25 pm
sjt wrote:purch wrote:zipzap wrote:In terms of the season that won't hurt the doggies too much, but means a lot for us, getting our season kick started as CSB mentioned. Nothing to get cocky about but a sensational win nonetheless. Well done lads!
BTW as for Sturt getting favours from the umps, that statement can only be ironic surely.
Agreed zippy. Great win, but this can only be considered a launching pad for better things. Beating Central by that much in the minor round counts for nothing later in the year. There are plenty of examples of Central being crap at this time of year. Well done on your last minute bet on the Doubles Blues too zippyWish I'd done the same. Like you, I had a funny feeling about this game all week.
Fantastic captains game from Sheeds and other solid contributors included Crane (how about those clearances!), Gum, Giles, Chambo, McIntyre, Bowen, Bratton, Jaensch, Vassal, Fittock, Cubillo, Nelson, McGlone and Wark.
Wonderful spirit showed by the entire team after Giles booted his major...and I thought Buckets' influence was (for a change) very restricted.
Great win Blues! But MUST make it stick next Fri night against the Legs...Will we get Macca back? Did anyone see the 2s?
Apparently we won the ressies by 40 pts, no thanks to the scoreboard attendant who must have taken the scores down just 3 mins after the final siren! BOOOO! In addition, the pies were allegedly crap, the hotdogs were completelt f*kn awful and the number of deck chairs on the western wing...well...perhaps they should make a designated "standing only" area at HHO and cram all the deck chairs into some other corner. I hate sitting down at the footy...
(FWIW, I thought Gowans looked old, slow and a genuinely useless, grumpy old man today)
Wow, some of you guys don't learn. Glad you've updated it for 2010, saves going back to some of the posts after the Dogs got thrashed by the Blues at Unley last year.
Also one of the differences from last year, is early last year we weren't missing about six players.
A very good win to Sturt (though) not unexpected.
by FlyingHigh » Sun Apr 25, 2010 10:30 pm
csbowes wrote:For me, Sturt just KO'd Central with 30 minutes of sensational football in the opening term. We banged 4 goals on the board before Central got its first major and to be up by 26 points at quarter time was a fair reflection of the game. It was good, direct football, using the open spaces to our advantage, making Central run and run and run. The second term was a chance for Central to get back in it, but we put the first two on the board and extended the lead to 39 points at half-time.
For Central, who cares, one early season loss does not make any difference to them.
For Sturt, back on track, just need to keep that up, as we've already seen them fall back to crap football a week after a good win.
by smac » Sun Apr 25, 2010 10:35 pm
FlyingHigh wrote:THought umpiring was generally pretty good, except for Centrals getting the better of some inconsistencies in the third.
by sjt » Sun Apr 25, 2010 10:44 pm
purch wrote:sjt wrote:purch wrote:zipzap wrote:In terms of the season that won't hurt the doggies too much, but means a lot for us, getting our season kick started as CSB mentioned. Nothing to get cocky about but a sensational win nonetheless. Well done lads!
BTW as for Sturt getting favours from the umps, that statement can only be ironic surely.
Agreed zippy. Great win, but this can only be considered a launching pad for better things. Beating Central by that much in the minor round counts for nothing later in the year. There are plenty of examples of Central being crap at this time of year. Well done on your last minute bet on the Doubles Blues too zippyWish I'd done the same. Like you, I had a funny feeling about this game all week.
Fantastic captains game from Sheeds and other solid contributors included Crane (how about those clearances!), Gum, Giles, Chambo, McIntyre, Bowen, Bratton, Jaensch, Vassal, Fittock, Cubillo, Nelson, McGlone and Wark.
Wonderful spirit showed by the entire team after Giles booted his major...and I thought Buckets' influence was (for a change) very restricted.
Great win Blues! But MUST make it stick next Fri night against the Legs...Will we get Macca back? Did anyone see the 2s?
Apparently we won the ressies by 40 pts, no thanks to the scoreboard attendant who must have taken the scores down just 3 mins after the final siren! BOOOO! In addition, the pies were allegedly crap, the hotdogs were completelt f*kn awful and the number of deck chairs on the western wing...well...perhaps they should make a designated "standing only" area at HHO and cram all the deck chairs into some other corner. I hate sitting down at the footy...
(FWIW, I thought Gowans looked old, slow and a genuinely useless, grumpy old man today)
Wow, some of you guys don't learn. Glad you've updated it for 2010, saves going back to some of the posts after the Dogs got thrashed by the Blues at Unley last year.
Also one of the differences from last year, is early last year we weren't missing about six players.
A very good win to Sturt (though) not unexpected.
LMAO..not unexpected my ar5e!A (very) few of us had a funny feeling we might get* up...but not by that margin.
Oh and if you did read my post you would have noticed that beating the Dogs later in the year is the real challenge...injuries or no injuries, we'll take the 2 points though. I'm sure even some Dogs supporters would agree that Gowans had a shocker today. Cheers.
by FlyingHigh » Sun Apr 25, 2010 10:53 pm
smac wrote:FlyingHigh wrote:THought umpiring was generally pretty good, except for Centrals getting the better of some inconsistencies in the third.
Then you missed the fact Sturt were on the positive end of some inconsistencies in other quarters, which combines to provide some poor umpiring.
All I would like to see are umpires who pay free kicks for the same stuff all day instead of apparently changing interpretation after each break.
by Apachebulldog » Sun Apr 25, 2010 10:56 pm
by spell_check » Sun Apr 25, 2010 10:59 pm
FlyingHigh wrote:smac wrote:FlyingHigh wrote:THought umpiring was generally pretty good, except for Centrals getting the better of some inconsistencies in the third.
Then you missed the fact Sturt were on the positive end of some inconsistencies in other quarters, which combines to provide some poor umpiring.
All I would like to see are umpires who pay free kicks for the same stuff all day instead of apparently changing interpretation after each break.
Well, I didn't quite see it that way.
On another note, crowd according to AdelaideNow 4884. Thought there may have been more?
by purch » Sun Apr 25, 2010 11:19 pm
by Brucetiki » Sun Apr 25, 2010 11:21 pm
spell_check wrote:FlyingHigh wrote:smac wrote:FlyingHigh wrote:THought umpiring was generally pretty good, except for Centrals getting the better of some inconsistencies in the third.
Then you missed the fact Sturt were on the positive end of some inconsistencies in other quarters, which combines to provide some poor umpiring.
All I would like to see are umpires who pay free kicks for the same stuff all day instead of apparently changing interpretation after each break.
Well, I didn't quite see it that way.
On another note, crowd according to AdelaideNow 4884. Thought there may have been more?
It's still the biggest Anzac Day crowd since 2005:
2003: 8,694 - Sturt vs Central
2001: 6,834 - Central vs Eagles
2004: 6,215 - Central vs West
2005: 5,580 - Central vs Eagles
2002: 5,150 - Central vs Eagles
2010: 4,884 - Central vs Sturt
2006: 4,698 - Central vs Eagles
2007: 4,631 - Eagles vs Central
2008: 4,393 - Central vs North
2009: 2,854 - Central vs Glenelg
by Brucetiki » Sun Apr 25, 2010 11:24 pm
purch wrote:
Note how they are called Centrals by the locals
by smac » Sun Apr 25, 2010 11:28 pm
by scott » Sun Apr 25, 2010 11:32 pm
by sapaul » Sun Apr 25, 2010 11:42 pm
by jim5112 » Sun Apr 25, 2010 11:59 pm
FlyingHigh wrote:smac wrote:FlyingHigh wrote:THought umpiring was generally pretty good, except for Centrals getting the better of some inconsistencies in the third.
Then you missed the fact Sturt were on the positive end of some inconsistencies in other quarters, which combines to provide some poor umpiring.
All I would like to see are umpires who pay free kicks for the same stuff all day instead of apparently changing interpretation after each break.
Well, I didn't quite see it that way.
On another note, crowd according to AdelaideNow 4884. Thought there may have been more?
by Hazydog » Mon Apr 26, 2010 12:08 am
by smithy » Mon Apr 26, 2010 12:32 am
by Gravel » Mon Apr 26, 2010 12:53 am
by Voice » Mon Apr 26, 2010 12:54 am
csbowes wrote:mighty_tiger_79 wrote:the umpiring is terrible
sturt getting all the favours
Are you serious?
Were you even at the game? Geez I thought Central got more than their fair share... they had a run on at one point in the third quarter I think it was when they must have got 8 out of 10 or something. Certainly don't agree we had a free run from the men in white...
by Voice » Mon Apr 26, 2010 1:08 am
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |