by DOC » Thu Apr 01, 2010 11:00 pm
by whufc » Thu Apr 01, 2010 11:01 pm
NFC wrote:whufc wrote:NFC wrote:Great game, very enjoyable. Well done to South, I guess. Some dodgy umpiring decisions in the 3rd term.
Norwood showed some outstanding signs in the first half with direct, quick, footy. We lost but the signs are okay IMO.
Sorry mate but the signs are never good when you lose to South at home, that kind of mentality will keep Norwood at the bottom for a very long time.
Please don't tell me how to support. Yes losing to South at home is extremely disappointing but there were enough positives to tell me we're slowly on the right track. Were you there? If not then shut up please.
You can't go from the Hill era and from losing players and gaining NONE to all of a sudden being back to the glory years. It'll take some time.
by The Sleeping Giant » Thu Apr 01, 2010 11:03 pm
NFC wrote:The Sleeping Giant wrote:whufc wrote:NFC wrote:Great game, very enjoyable. Well done to South, I guess. Some dodgy umpiring decisions in the 3rd term.
Norwood showed some outstanding signs in the first half with direct, quick, footy. We lost but the signs are okay IMO.
Sorry mate but the signs are never good when you lose to South at home, that kind of mentality will keep Norwood at the bottom for a very long time.
Blaming the umpires too?
All I said that there were some dodgy decisions. I'm not saying it was the reason we lost simply pointing out there were some questionable free kicks paid. My goodness...
by DOC » Thu Apr 01, 2010 11:04 pm
whufc wrote:NFC wrote:whufc wrote:NFC wrote:Great game, very enjoyable. Well done to South, I guess. Some dodgy umpiring decisions in the 3rd term.
Norwood showed some outstanding signs in the first half with direct, quick, footy. We lost but the signs are okay IMO.
Sorry mate but the signs are never good when you lose to South at home, that kind of mentality will keep Norwood at the bottom for a very long time.
Please don't tell me how to support. Yes losing to South at home is extremely disappointing but there were enough positives to tell me we're slowly on the right track. Were you there? If not then shut up please.
You can't go from the Hill era and from losing players and gaining NONE to all of a sudden being back to the glory years. It'll take some time.
Theres still plenty of talent at Norwood that they should not be losing to South at home, im not telling you how to support but saying there were positives tonight is being the ultimate optimist.
by whufc » Thu Apr 01, 2010 11:05 pm
by Hopeful Jelly » Thu Apr 01, 2010 11:07 pm
P W L D PERC PTS
1 PANTHERS 2 1 0 1 50.8 3
2 WEST 1 1 0 0 76.8 2
3 GLENELG 1 1 0 0 75.3 2
4 CENTRAL 1 1 0 0 53.2 2
5 STURT 1 0 0 1 50.0 1
6 PORT 1 0 1 0 46.7 0
7 NORWOOD 2 0 2 0 37.0 0
8 NORTH 1 0 1 0 23.2 0
9 EAGLES 0 0 0 0 00.0 0
by DOC » Thu Apr 01, 2010 11:09 pm
whufc wrote:lol how many of them premierships were you alive for
by Wedgie » Thu Apr 01, 2010 11:26 pm
Hopeful Jelly wrote:For the South fans:
- Code: Select all
P W L D PERC PTS
1 PANTHERS 2 1 0 1 50.8 3
2 WEST 1 1 0 0 76.8 2
3 GLENELG 1 1 0 0 75.3 2
4 CENTRAL 1 1 0 0 53.2 2
5 STURT 1 0 0 1 50.0 1
6 PORT 1 0 1 0 46.7 0
7 NORWOOD 2 0 2 0 37.0 0
8 NORTH 1 0 1 0 23.2 0
9 EAGLES 0 0 0 0 00.0 0
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by DOC » Thu Apr 01, 2010 11:27 pm
by EasyE » Thu Apr 01, 2010 11:38 pm
DOC wrote:whufc wrote:lol how many of them premierships were you alive for
Can't remember. Just shows what a long and proud history we have.
Do you remember who was the sponsoring club for Centrals to be admitted to the league?
by Sojourner » Thu Apr 01, 2010 11:40 pm
by bayman » Thu Apr 01, 2010 11:42 pm
by UK Fan » Thu Apr 01, 2010 11:46 pm
fester69 wrote: I'm full of "pish and wind" !!You can call me weak !!
MW wrote: Well call me a special asshole!.
Booney wrote: I'm a happy clapper **** stick.
by JK » Thu Apr 01, 2010 11:51 pm
UKPanther wrote:Thanks for the updates JAS, really apppreciate them. Sorry it did't go your way tonight.
Am really proud of the players for fighting that out. At half time I thought the 27 point margin was too much but the players showed real character to fight back and win a close one. It was especially important to win it after last week. We seem to be heading in the right direction which is great. Am sure there will be some up's and down's ahead but hopefully we continue to improve and keep fighting games out.![]()
by southee » Fri Apr 02, 2010 12:11 am
by bloods08 » Fri Apr 02, 2010 12:27 am
by blueandwhite » Fri Apr 02, 2010 12:29 am
by blueandwhite » Fri Apr 02, 2010 12:32 am
bloods08 wrote:Just a quick question:
Did Alex Stopp actually have a touch tonight?
Seemed more worried about bumping and niggling Ben Warren than he was about the ball.
Credit to Warren for not retaliating as I'm sure many players would have just belted Stopp.
by bayman » Fri Apr 02, 2010 12:33 am
by bayman » Fri Apr 02, 2010 12:35 am
bloods08 wrote:Just a quick question:
Did Alex Stopp actually have a touch tonight?
Seemed more worried about bumping and niggling Ben Warren than he was about the ball.
Credit to Warren for not retaliating as I'm sure many players would have just belted Stopp.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |