by spell_check » Mon Feb 01, 2010 8:38 pm
by spell_check » Mon May 03, 2010 10:10 pm
by purch » Mon May 03, 2010 10:20 pm
Wedgie wrote:Any rule that makes Hawthorn drop out of the finals and Geelong win another flag gets my vote!
by johntheclaret » Thu May 06, 2010 9:22 am
Punk Rooster wrote:our game doesn't need changing.
by johntheclaret » Thu May 06, 2010 9:32 am
by HeartBeatsTrue » Thu May 06, 2010 2:13 pm
by Big Phil » Thu May 06, 2010 2:42 pm
HeartBeatsTrue wrote:Having a discussion the other day about rushed behinds in the SANFL.
Has the SANFL implemented the delibrate rushed behind rule same as AFL this year? I thought I read somewhere on here it has.
by spell_check » Fri Aug 27, 2010 11:17 pm
Year Rushed Total %
1991 471 2575 18.29
1992 503 2708 18.57
1993 442 2541 17.39
1994 495 2728 18.15
1995 414 2489 16.63
1996 309 2011 15.37
1997 293 1993 14.70
1998 363 1978 18.35
1999 343 1954 17.55
2000 371 2203 16.84
2001 323 2027 15.93
2002 377 2050 18.39
2003 362 2042 17.73
2004 343 1993 17.21
2005 355 2167 16.38
2006 371 2297 16.15
2007 341 2118 16.10
2008 393 2074 18.95
2009 323 2015 16.03
2010 242 1543 15.68
by prowling panther » Sat Aug 28, 2010 12:38 am
Big Phil wrote:HeartBeatsTrue wrote:Having a discussion the other day about rushed behinds in the SANFL.
Has the SANFL implemented the deliberate rushed behind rule same as AFL this year? I thought I read somewhere on here it has.
Yes, it has and there already has been a couple of incidents where free kicks have been paid.
One was against Ian Callinan playing for Central against West in Round 3 at Elizabeth, I can't quite remember the other one though, think it was at Richmond between West and Norwood maybe ?
Agree the penalty for a breach of the rule is too harsh, should be a ball up at the top of the goal square IMO, as opposed to a free kick paid on the goal line, too harsh.
by Wedgie » Sat Aug 28, 2010 8:57 am
prowling panther wrote:Maybe some of the North supporters at Prospect when South played there a couple of weeks ago might just like to take note of this rule change, they were a real bunch of yobbos, giving the club a bad name with their carry ons.
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by CENTURION » Sat Aug 28, 2010 11:06 am
Dutchy wrote:Id like to see the removal of point posts full stop. Why reward a team for missing?
by prowling panther » Sat Aug 28, 2010 7:34 pm
Wedgie wrote:prowling panther wrote:Maybe some of the North supporters at Prospect when South played there a couple of weeks ago might just like to take note of this rule change, they were a real bunch of yobbos, giving the club a bad name with their carry ons.
Wow mate, they must have been bad for you to feel the need to bring it up 2 weeks after the game by quoting a 3 month old post in a 7 month old topic discussing rushed behinds!![]()
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |