by Aerie » Sat Jun 21, 2008 2:02 pm
by whatever » Sat Jun 21, 2008 2:08 pm
by croc11 » Sun Jun 22, 2008 12:06 am
by am Bays » Sun Jun 22, 2008 4:31 pm
by MightyEagles » Sun Jun 22, 2008 5:01 pm
by Mickyj » Sun Jun 22, 2008 5:11 pm
MightyEagles wrote:I can understand why changing it to an u/18s or just having just u/19s is favoured by a lot of people, but I have my own reasons why I want it to stay the way it is, which is that I want to stay away from a few people.
by MightyEagles » Sun Jun 22, 2008 5:24 pm
Mickyj wrote:MightyEagles wrote:I can understand why changing it to an u/18s or just having just u/19s is favoured by a lot of people, but I have my own reasons why I want it to stay the way it is, which is that I want to stay away from a few people.
Not me I hope ME![]()
Would make it a very long day If we got to the ground to watch the u19's seconds and league.
by Mickyj » Sun Jun 22, 2008 5:34 pm
MightyEagles wrote:Mickyj wrote:MightyEagles wrote:I can understand why changing it to an u/18s or just having just u/19s is favoured by a lot of people, but I have my own reasons why I want it to stay the way it is, which is that I want to stay away from a few people.
Not me I hope ME![]()
Would make it a very long day If we got to the ground to watch the u19's seconds and league.
Not you, just some other people that I can't stand, it would be a long day if we watched 3 games, I watched 3.75 games the other week when we played Central. I watched the 17's, 19's, Reserves and 3qtrs of the League game.
by ca » Mon Jun 23, 2008 4:48 pm
by sturtpeter » Mon Jun 23, 2008 4:50 pm
by croc11 » Mon Jun 23, 2008 9:42 pm
by Hawks22 » Tue Jun 24, 2008 3:22 pm
by MightyEagles » Tue Jun 24, 2008 4:44 pm
by darley16 » Tue Jun 24, 2008 4:57 pm
by spell_check » Tue Jun 24, 2008 7:49 pm
darley16 wrote:Last months SANFL meeting had agreement from 7 of the 9 clubs to introduce U/18. This is short sighted in losing kids not only to the SANFL system but potentially to the sport as well as involving less parents/families with SANFL clubs that may become members, supporters, sponsors. I understand the reduced cost of fielding one less team but the greater cost to both the SANFL,the clubs and the sport is far greater. It's not as though the SANFL is struggling financially.
However, this is all influenced by the AFL plan of having one national U/18 comp to support the AFL with all state leagues reduced to amateur footy thereby not draining potential support and sponsorship from their product. Losing support from AFL back to SANFL as has been seen this year with crowd numbers is Dimitrio's worst nightmare.
by whatever » Tue Jun 24, 2008 9:38 pm
by cd » Wed Jun 25, 2008 12:00 am
by darley16 » Wed Jun 25, 2008 10:27 am
by Sojourner » Wed Jun 25, 2008 1:49 pm
by smac » Wed Jun 25, 2008 1:59 pm
Sojourner wrote:It wouldent have been unreasonable for the club to have canvassed their members thoughts on this prior to voting. South have not been successfull at league level for a long time yet have a rich history of doing well in the u/17 & u/19 competitions which is the same history that there yes vote shoots to hell.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |