Dutchy wrote:OK then the WA Official who ran a coaching course for WA affiliated clubs must be wrong then?
It may be a throw away line that he uses to encourage youngsters and junior coaches to inspire them?
by Booney » Tue Nov 22, 2011 11:25 am
Dutchy wrote:OK then the WA Official who ran a coaching course for WA affiliated clubs must be wrong then?
by redandblack » Tue Nov 22, 2011 11:26 am
by Mr Beefy » Tue Nov 22, 2011 11:30 am
by nickname » Tue Nov 22, 2011 11:36 am
Dutchy wrote:Certainly wouldnt think he would be giving a personal opinion in a formal club presentation to a group of people, but anyway I know what I saw and heard.
by Booney » Tue Nov 22, 2011 11:40 am
Dutchy wrote:Certainly wouldnt think he would be giving a personal opinion in a formal club presentation to a group of people, but anyway I know what I saw and heard.
by The Sleeping Giant » Tue Nov 22, 2011 11:47 am
redandblack wrote:Memo to: Dutchy
From: Public Relations Dept.
Message:
Mate, you have two options. The first is to retreat quickly and just look totally silly, but live to fight another day.
The second is to try to argue your case further, in which case we can sell you a ladder to get out of the big hole you're digging yourself.
We advise Option 1.
by redandblack » Tue Nov 22, 2011 11:52 am
by Dutchy » Tue Nov 22, 2011 11:55 am
by once_were_warriors » Tue Nov 22, 2011 11:57 am
by redandblack » Tue Nov 22, 2011 1:35 pm
Dutchy wrote:Ill dig out the slides tonight, as it might have even been in writing. Then who will be the one looking silly?![]()
Of course the club would want to win a premiership, Im not saying that.
by The Sleeping Giant » Tue Nov 22, 2011 1:36 pm
once_were_warriors wrote:They could just seed WWTFC and CDFC as 1 and 2.
Everyone else plays the minor round and finals , to then play WWTFC and CDFC in two semi finals and ultimately the cup final.
Make Prize money 80k 1st, 40 K 2nd every other position 20K.
All expenses payed by foxtel.
by redandblack » Tue Nov 22, 2011 1:37 pm
topsywaldron wrote:redandblack wrote:North, Port and West repaid for loyalty is my best guess.
By it first being offered to teams who finished above them?
You're a glass half full kind of guy I guess.
by Booney » Tue Nov 22, 2011 1:50 pm
The Sleeping Giant wrote:once_were_warriors wrote:They could just seed WWTFC and CDFC as 1 and 2.
Everyone else plays the minor round and finals , to then play WWTFC and CDFC in two semi finals and ultimately the cup final.
Make Prize money 80k 1st, 40 K 2nd every other position 20K.
All expenses payed by foxtel.
I challenge someone to come up with a dumber suggestion.
by topsywaldron » Tue Nov 22, 2011 3:07 pm
redandblack wrote:topsywaldron wrote:redandblack wrote:North, Port and West repaid for loyalty is my best guess.
By it first being offered to teams who finished above them?
You're a glass half full kind of guy I guess.
Considering South will probably agree, I'll go for South, Port and West to be our representatives.
by The Sleeping Giant » Tue Nov 22, 2011 3:33 pm
by redandblack » Tue Nov 22, 2011 3:37 pm
topsywaldron wrote:redandblack wrote:topsywaldron wrote:redandblack wrote:North, Port and West repaid for loyalty is my best guess.
By it first being offered to teams who finished above them?
You're a glass half full kind of guy I guess.
Considering South will probably agree, I'll go for South, Port and West to be our representatives.
Loyalty to North forgotten already?
by Booney » Tue Nov 22, 2011 3:38 pm
The Sleeping Giant wrote:Devastated
by beenreal » Tue Nov 22, 2011 4:22 pm
Pseudo wrote:beenreal wrote:Pseudo wrote:...
I'm not averse to the Foxtel cup in principle, but it has to be run in such a way that the integrity of the SANFL competition is not compromised. Perhaps it would work if it was held pre-season during the trial match period. Would be minimal disruption to the SANFL season proper, and the modest prizemoney might make it worthwhile for the better teams, since they'd be playing trial matches anyway.
That defeats the purpose of the cup, ie. to fill in the gap between AFL matches.
Indeed it does defeat that purpose.
However if that is the sole purpose of the competition then I suggest that it's not worth having.
by The Sleeping Giant » Tue Nov 22, 2011 4:40 pm
Booney wrote:The Sleeping Giant wrote:Devastated
I know. If anyone is willing to have a crack at North, it's North supporters*!
*Kids, non-Members, Members, Board Members....
by once_were_warriors » Tue Nov 22, 2011 4:44 pm
Booney wrote:The Sleeping Giant wrote:once_were_warriors wrote:They could just seed WWTFC and CDFC as 1 and 2.
Everyone else plays the minor round and finals , to then play WWTFC and CDFC in two semi finals and ultimately the cup final.
Make Prize money 80k 1st, 40 K 2nd every other position 20K.
All expenses payed by foxtel.
I challenge someone to come up with a dumber suggestion.
I sir am willing to wager that such a thing is not possible.![]()
Port Melbourne and Williamstown are also interested in the outcome.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |