kickinit wrote:CUTTERMAN wrote:I asked this in the other thread and never got an answer so I'll ask it again Beenreal.
Would you be happy for Port to be playing in a league with such an unfair advantage. One where the other teams played to a totally different salary cap and access to players?
Also, would you be happy if Adelaide got the go ahead for a reserves team in the SANFL league and Port didn't?
is it fair for port power/crows to recruit guys from interstate set them up in adelaide and have a opposite sanfl club stuff around with the development of that player? the current system isn't fair as it is. A sanfl team could have all of their afl recruits playing afl while playing against another sanfl team that has all of theirs available. Bit hard to say it's a unfair situation when the current situation isn't fair.
The current system is not perfect in terms of fairness to SANFL clubs and how AFL players may impact results.
On balance it should impact all clubs equally.
Your favoured system is clearly biased in favour of one club and negatively impacts all others.
You can't seriously suggest it is a fairer solution.
Is it fair that Port and Crows save about 350k a year by not having to resource their own reserves team and yet the SANFL clubs allow their players to engage in high level, competitive football week in, week out for no charge?