Constance_Perm wrote:I thought Norwood's problem was that they "forgot" to include ANY of Doyles salary against a coaching position?
Surely the SANFL would have to take into account that Doyle "forgot" to play for most of that year?

by topsywaldron » Wed Mar 17, 2010 9:02 am
Constance_Perm wrote:I thought Norwood's problem was that they "forgot" to include ANY of Doyles salary against a coaching position?
by Wedgie » Wed Mar 17, 2010 9:06 am
topsywaldron wrote:nickname wrote:I wouldn't include South in the 'technical' category, theirs was a far less benign effort.
No problem, they can go into the 'real cheats' pile, the others are just 'technical cheats' if I'm reading some North fans on here correctly.
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by Booney » Wed Mar 17, 2010 9:32 am
Wedgie wrote:topsywaldron wrote:nickname wrote:I wouldn't include South in the 'technical' category, theirs was a far less benign effort.
No problem, they can go into the 'real cheats' pile, the others are just 'technical cheats' if I'm reading some North fans on here correctly.
There is a difference between man slaughter and murder Topsy.
by JK » Wed Mar 17, 2010 10:04 am
topsywaldron wrote:nickname wrote:I wouldn't include South in the 'technical' category, theirs was a far less benign effort.
No problem, they can go into the 'real cheats' pile, the others are just 'technical cheats' if I'm reading some North fans on here correctly.
by Zorro » Wed Mar 17, 2010 10:31 am
Booney wrote:Wedgie wrote:topsywaldron wrote:nickname wrote:I wouldn't include South in the 'technical' category, theirs was a far less benign effort.
No problem, they can go into the 'real cheats' pile, the others are just 'technical cheats' if I'm reading some North fans on here correctly.
There is a difference between man slaughter and murder Topsy.
Yep. The victim is either dead or dead.
by HeartBeatsTrue » Wed Mar 17, 2010 10:50 am
Both of which incurs prison time.Wedgie wrote:topsywaldron wrote:nickname wrote:I wouldn't include South in the 'technical' category, theirs was a far less benign effort.
No problem, they can go into the 'real cheats' pile, the others are just 'technical cheats' if I'm reading some North fans on here correctly.
There is a difference between man slaughter and murder Topsy.
by Wedgie » Wed Mar 17, 2010 10:52 am
HeartBeatsTrue wrote:Both of which incurs prison time.Wedgie wrote:topsywaldron wrote:nickname wrote:I wouldn't include South in the 'technical' category, theirs was a far less benign effort.
No problem, they can go into the 'real cheats' pile, the others are just 'technical cheats' if I'm reading some North fans on here correctly.
There is a difference between man slaughter and murder Topsy.
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by Squawk » Wed Mar 17, 2010 11:38 am
Wedgie wrote:There is a difference between man slaughter and murder Topsy.
by HeartBeatsTrue » Wed Mar 17, 2010 11:51 am
by doggies4eva » Wed Mar 17, 2010 1:54 pm
by Booney » Wed Mar 17, 2010 2:10 pm
HeartBeatsTrue wrote:Fact of the matter is with the current rules re salary cap breach punishment, North got away scot free.
IMO fine shouldnt be dollar for dollar. It makes it easy for well off clubs to breach the cap purposely by under $5000 every now and then.
A coincidence i'm sure but North knows the rules re fines and the breach was not far under $5K.
by Wedgie » Wed Mar 17, 2010 2:12 pm
Booney wrote:HeartBeatsTrue wrote:Fact of the matter is with the current rules re salary cap breach punishment, North got away scot free.
IMO fine shouldnt be dollar for dollar. It makes it easy for well off clubs to breach the cap purposely by under $5000 every now and then.
A coincidence i'm sure but North knows the rules re fines and the breach was not far under $5K.
Oh, good point. $for$ up to $5k so go just short of the $5k the player/coach (lol) is happy and the club is not much out of pocket. Very good point.
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by Booney » Wed Mar 17, 2010 2:18 pm
by tipper » Wed Mar 17, 2010 2:39 pm
Booney wrote:My employer and I agree to a figure for the year and my employer has no buffer zone for making errors, either way.
Surely performance incentives or any variables are always calculated in anticipation of the club having to pay every cent and not the opposite. ( paying no incentives )
by Wedgie » Wed Mar 17, 2010 2:46 pm
Booney wrote:My employer and I agree to a figure for the year and my employer has no buffer zone for making errors, either way.
Surely performance incentives or any variables are always calculated in anticipation of the club having to pay every cent and not the opposite. ( paying no incentives )
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by Booney » Wed Mar 17, 2010 2:48 pm
tipper wrote:Booney wrote:My employer and I agree to a figure for the year and my employer has no buffer zone for making errors, either way.
Surely performance incentives or any variables are always calculated in anticipation of the club having to pay every cent and not the opposite. ( paying no incentives )
so you are saying that the clubs should work on that basis that every single player on their lists will play every single game in the league side? and make the best players every week? and no one will have any injuries that may prevent them from playing?
with players on differing renumeration levels, rewards scales etc it would be a very fine balancing act to work it out. i dont think it can be compared to someone working for a business in the "real world".
by Squawk » Wed Mar 17, 2010 2:49 pm
Booney wrote:My employer and I agree to a figure for the year and my employer has no buffer zone for making errors, either way.
by Wedgie » Wed Mar 17, 2010 2:50 pm
Booney wrote:tipper wrote:Booney wrote:My employer and I agree to a figure for the year and my employer has no buffer zone for making errors, either way.
Surely performance incentives or any variables are always calculated in anticipation of the club having to pay every cent and not the opposite. ( paying no incentives )
so you are saying that the clubs should work on that basis that every single player on their lists will play every single game in the league side? and make the best players every week? and no one will have any injuries that may prevent them from playing?
with players on differing renumeration levels, rewards scales etc it would be a very fine balancing act to work it out. i dont think it can be compared to someone working for a business in the "real world".
No,but surely they work on worst case for them. ( For salary purposes,not on field success ) ie: the best players playing all games.
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by Squawk » Wed Mar 17, 2010 2:51 pm
tipper wrote:with players on differing renumeration levels, rewards scales etc it would be a very fine balancing act to work it out. i dont think it can be compared to someone working for a business in the "real world".
by mackdaddy » Wed Mar 17, 2010 2:53 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |