Dutchy wrote:You exceeded the cap but would have bought another player, how does that work?
Ask Matt Slade about contract negotiations with Kris.
#brownbags
by topsywaldron » Thu Nov 22, 2012 6:18 pm
Dutchy wrote:You exceeded the cap but would have bought another player, how does that work?
by whufc » Thu Nov 22, 2012 6:20 pm
by CENTURION » Thu Nov 22, 2012 6:30 pm
topsywaldron wrote:Dutchy wrote:You exceeded the cap but would have bought another player, how does that work?
Ask Matt Slade about contract negotiations with Kris.
#brownbags
by topsywaldron » Thu Nov 22, 2012 6:54 pm
whufc wrote:Dittmar made a rumour from thin air and magically got half right mmmm
by whufc » Thu Nov 22, 2012 7:15 pm
topsywaldron wrote:whufc wrote:Dittmar made a rumour from thin air and magically got half right mmmm
Keeping the dream alive I see.
by Robe Dog » Thu Nov 22, 2012 7:54 pm
by Dogwatcher » Thu Nov 22, 2012 8:07 pm
topsywaldron wrote:teaoby wrote:Dittmar just public apologised and retracted his statement on air.
Norwood all clear
Hilarious.
And Forum Police Operative Dogwatcher wonders why I wasn't commenting on a non story.
by nwdfanparade » Thu Nov 22, 2012 8:24 pm
whufc wrote: Massive difference we could of bought another player prior to the season and won the cup by shitloads Kris grant was even quoted as saying he didn't care we broke it after the season as the players who won the cup within the rules deserved the gifts
by Big Phil » Thu Nov 22, 2012 8:25 pm
nwdfanparade wrote:whufc wrote: Massive difference we could of bought another player prior to the season and won the cup by shitloads Kris grant was even quoted as saying he didn't care we broke it after the season as the players who won the cup within the rules deserved the gifts
Out of curiosity, what were the gifts that the players received?
by whufc » Thu Nov 22, 2012 8:26 pm
nwdfanparade wrote:whufc wrote: Massive difference we could of bought another player prior to the season and won the cup by shitloads Kris grant was even quoted as saying he didn't care we broke it after the season as the players who won the cup within the rules deserved the gifts
Out of curiosity, what ywere the gifts that the players received?
by SDK » Thu Nov 22, 2012 8:37 pm
by Dogwatcher » Thu Nov 22, 2012 8:39 pm
by Spargo » Thu Nov 22, 2012 9:01 pm
by SDK » Thu Nov 22, 2012 9:02 pm
by Spargo » Thu Nov 22, 2012 9:06 pm
SDK wrote:I remember talking to my old mate Staz after the 1975 premiership and after trying to buy a beer he pulled out a roll of $50 notes as thick as my arm. He said Butto had a couple of kitbags full of these.
Contributions from generous supporters should not be part of the salary cap any more than a few DVD player should be ... full of cash or not !
by topsywaldron » Thu Nov 22, 2012 9:10 pm
Dogwatcher wrote:But congrats on it being not proved that you didn't cheat the salary cap.
by smac » Thu Nov 22, 2012 9:16 pm
SDK wrote:The salary cap is imposed upon the SANFL by the AFL in a master/slave relationship. Accordingly I do not recognise it and encourage EVERY club to break it. We all know EVERY club breaks it to varying degrees and this is how it should be.
by Dogwatcher » Thu Nov 22, 2012 9:16 pm
by Spargo » Thu Nov 22, 2012 9:27 pm
whufc wrote:Massive difference we could of bought another player prior to the season and won the cup by shitloads
Kris grant was even quoted as saying he didn't care we broke it after the season as the players who won the cup within the rules deserved the gifts
by Squawk » Thu Nov 22, 2012 9:49 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |