by bayman » Fri Sep 11, 2009 11:51 am
by whufc » Fri Sep 11, 2009 11:52 am
bayman wrote:my mail is that it will indeed be bamford & his first decision will/is to sack clayton as good as player as he is, he must go given what's happened in the past so the wharvies can move forward
by bickle » Fri Sep 11, 2009 11:59 am
bayman wrote:my mail is that it will indeed be bamford & his first decision will/is to sack clayton as good as player as he is, he must go given what's happened in the past so the wharvies can move forward
by beenreal » Fri Sep 11, 2009 12:31 pm
whufc wrote:bayman wrote:my mail is that it will indeed be bamford & his first decision will/is to sack clayton as good as player as he is, he must go given what's happened in the past so the wharvies can move forward
I would be very happy if Roy Laird gave his phone a tingle, the Gowans would keep him in line.
by whufc » Fri Sep 11, 2009 12:32 pm
beenreal wrote:whufc wrote:bayman wrote:my mail is that it will indeed be bamford & his first decision will/is to sack clayton as good as player as he is, he must go given what's happened in the past so the wharvies can move forward
I would be very happy if Roy Laird gave his phone a tingle, the Gowans would keep him in line.
Yeah, but then you'd have to put up with Kyle Jenner sooking again.
by overloaded » Fri Sep 11, 2009 9:05 pm
NO-MERCY wrote:As far as Knights & his first year at Alberton he only missed the finals by 1 win but given a couple more years & players taking onboard his new structures & game plan i have know doubt they would of been alot more successful than the current 5 years, i honestly think the club realises that now.
Yes he's doing a great job at Essendon.
therealROSSCO wrote:Now listen to this loud and clear.....
I have not been approached to coach at the WFC this year, next year or any year. I have not approached the WFC to coach this year, next year or any year. This is an unconditional statement.
by overloaded » Fri Sep 11, 2009 9:07 pm
bayman wrote:my mail is that it will indeed be bamford & his first decision will/is to sack clayton as good as player as he is, he must go given what's happened in the past so the wharvies can move forward
therealROSSCO wrote:Now listen to this loud and clear.....
I have not been approached to coach at the WFC this year, next year or any year. I have not approached the WFC to coach this year, next year or any year. This is an unconditional statement.
by beenreal » Fri Sep 11, 2009 9:41 pm
overloaded wrote:bayman wrote:my mail is that it will indeed be bamford & his first decision will/is to sack clayton as good as player as he is, he must go given what's happened in the past so the wharvies can move forward
As good a player as he is, he has got to go. He is undisciplined, has a very poor rapport with the younger players and does not lead by example.
by NO-MERCY » Fri Sep 11, 2009 10:51 pm
by beenreal » Sat Sep 12, 2009 9:54 am
NO-MERCY wrote:Mislead about the direction of the club![]()
How longs he been there? You would of thought he's old enough & experienced enough to work it out for himself where the clubs heading.
by Mickyj » Sat Sep 12, 2009 10:05 am
beenreal wrote:NO-MERCY wrote:Mislead about the direction of the club![]()
How longs he been there? You would of thought he's old enough & experienced enough to work it out for himself where the clubs heading.
The one thing that is missing from his stellar career is a Premiership. And every year he stays at the Magpies, he seems to be getting further away from one. Does anyone believe that would not be frustrating him?
And no, I am not related to him NM.
by overloaded » Sat Sep 12, 2009 10:34 am
beenreal wrote:overloaded wrote:bayman wrote:my mail is that it will indeed be bamford & his first decision will/is to sack clayton as good as player as he is, he must go given what's happened in the past so the wharvies can move forward
As good a player as he is, he has got to go. He is undisciplined, has a very poor rapport with the younger players and does not lead by example.
Jeremy Clayton was clearly mislead about the direction of the club when he signed on and is clearly frustrated by the lack of success. And anyone who wants to see him tearing us a new one by playing against us, clearly has rocks in their head.
therealROSSCO wrote:Now listen to this loud and clear.....
I have not been approached to coach at the WFC this year, next year or any year. I have not approached the WFC to coach this year, next year or any year. This is an unconditional statement.
by Lynwood » Sat Sep 12, 2009 6:53 pm
overloaded wrote:beenreal wrote:overloaded wrote:bayman wrote:my mail is that it will indeed be bamford & his first decision will/is to sack clayton as good as player as he is, he must go given what's happened in the past so the wharvies can move forward
As good a player as he is, he has got to go. He is undisciplined, has a very poor rapport with the younger players and does not lead by example.
Jeremy Clayton was clearly mislead about the direction of the club when he signed on and is clearly frustrated by the lack of success. And anyone who wants to see him tearing us a new one by playing against us, clearly has rocks in their head.
Well what good was Clayton when he sat on his arse on the sidelines for 6 weeks because he was selfish and undisciplined?
by spell_check » Sat Sep 12, 2009 7:01 pm
Mickyj wrote:beenreal wrote:NO-MERCY wrote:Mislead about the direction of the club![]()
How longs he been there? You would of thought he's old enough & experienced enough to work it out for himself where the clubs heading.
The one thing that is missing from his stellar career is a Premiership. And every year he stays at the Magpies, he seems to be getting further away from one. Does anyone believe that would not be frustrating him?
And no, I am not related to him NM.
Was he the Clayton the Eagles tried to sign then missed out on ?
by Lynwood » Sat Sep 12, 2009 7:12 pm
by Mickyj » Sat Sep 12, 2009 10:45 pm
spell_check wrote:Mickyj wrote:beenreal wrote:NO-MERCY wrote:Mislead about the direction of the club![]()
How longs he been there? You would of thought he's old enough & experienced enough to work it out for himself where the clubs heading.
The one thing that is missing from his stellar career is a Premiership. And every year he stays at the Magpies, he seems to be getting further away from one. Does anyone believe that would not be frustrating him?
And no, I am not related to him NM.
Was he the Clayton the Eagles tried to sign then missed out on ?
Yes, he was signed by us I believe pending the 2003(?) National Draft. North Melbourne picked him up and then was delisted at the end of 2004.
by Barto » Sat Sep 12, 2009 11:46 pm
NO-MERCY wrote:work it out for himself where the clubs heading.
by bayman » Sun Sep 13, 2009 10:29 am
Barto wrote:NO-MERCY wrote:work it out for himself where the clubs heading.
"Iceberg! Right ahead!"
by beenreal » Sun Sep 13, 2009 10:35 am
bayman wrote:Barto wrote:NO-MERCY wrote:work it out for himself where the clubs heading.
"Iceberg! Right ahead!"
sounds like 'the titanic'
by whatever » Sun Sep 13, 2009 10:30 pm
NO-MERCY wrote:[quote="beenreal"
My understanding is that Nick Frost and Josh Moody are both on long term injury.
What playing for Salis Nth & Goodwood Saints in the Amateur League.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |