TimmiesChin wrote:I'd be interested to see a breakdown on peoples opinions on this issue, grouped by the AFL club they support. Having a quick flick through posts, there seem to be some pretty significant trends.
I'm a Crows member and also a South Adelaide member/supporter since the late 1950s and I go to all Crows games plus have a South home and away season ticket too.
My view is that:
(i) Port (Magpies) should drop their SANFL league, reserves, under 18s etc and lose their zones
(ii) Their zones can be re-allocated amongst the 8 SANFL clubs (along with a state wide rezoning) helping to alleviate the current zoning problems that most clubs are having (eg South, Centrals and the western Adelaide squeeze)
(iii) Port (Power) can then use Port Magpies as their AFL reserves team with Adelaide Crows also having an AFL reserves team with both being topped up by players from ?? (to be determined - imo from places such as the APY etc).
(iv) The Crows & Port AFL reserves teams to play either in the VFL or in the SANFL league as the 9th and 10th sides and if the AFL ever has a dedicated AFL reserves competition in the future, then the Crows & Port reserves can quite readily drop out of the SANFL leaving the 8 clubs.
(v) I cannot understand how a PAFC already struggling financially with both its Magpies and its Power components can sustain running both an AFL and a full SANFL presence and in any case, it would be manifestly unfair for the 8 other SANFL clubs for a Port Magpies to have both all Power players available plus its zoning.