Booney wrote:Dogwatcher wrote:Booney wrote:Then they'd both know the Redlegs representative, would they like to promote him, you think?
Good radio's good radio.
Rules out Triple M then, doesn't it?
Zing!
by Dogwatcher » Mon Apr 04, 2016 1:24 pm
Booney wrote:Dogwatcher wrote:Booney wrote:Then they'd both know the Redlegs representative, would they like to promote him, you think?
Good radio's good radio.
Rules out Triple M then, doesn't it?
by stan » Mon Apr 04, 2016 1:42 pm
Magellan wrote:Perhaps the above has revealed my lack of knowledge (and interest, more to the point) in the SA radio market. So there are rivals which could hear Fester's side of the story.![]()
However, I can't see Fester's 'SANFL-based' point of view being taken on board or seriously by the collective and individual intellectual might of Roo, Ditts, Jarman and Lewis, all of whom serve an audience which wants an AFL point of view.
But I could be wrong. Get to the airwaves, Fester! I might listen for a change.
by Jim05 » Mon Apr 04, 2016 2:17 pm
by heater31 » Mon Apr 04, 2016 3:36 pm
Jim05 wrote:I'm waiting for that Burtenshaw clown to come on here and add his two cents worth or has he closed his account
by Scoop » Mon Apr 04, 2016 3:42 pm
by stan » Mon Apr 04, 2016 3:45 pm
Scoop wrote:Private, plain clothes security guards? And what authority do they have over a member of the public? They'd just look like any other punter telling you to shut up - and should have just about as much power as them too. Other than getting between the precious, delicate AFL players and members of the public they shouldn't be able to do anything, surely. Or should that be, surely?
by Corona Man » Mon Apr 04, 2016 3:52 pm
by whufc » Mon Apr 04, 2016 7:11 pm
Scoop wrote:Private, plain clothes security guards? And what authority do they have over a member of the public? They'd just look like any other punter telling you to shut up - and should have just about as much power as them too. Other than getting between the precious, delicate AFL players and members of the public they shouldn't be able to do anything, surely. Or should that be, surely?
by Spargo » Sun Apr 17, 2016 9:13 am
by Jim05 » Sun Apr 17, 2016 9:30 am
Spargo wrote:Allegedly twenty or so Norwood "supporters" waited at the race after the game & hurled abuse at Kane Cornes.
I'm not siding with Cornes (or his brother & old man) and never did, but this just makes these "supporters" look like dickheads.
Norwood had since moved on from the incidents v Port, this only puts them in a bad light.
Where was security?
by whufc » Sun Apr 17, 2016 11:05 am
Spargo wrote:Allegedly twenty or so Norwood "supporters" waited at the race after the game & hurled abuse at Kane Cornes.
I'm not siding with Cornes (or his brother & old man) and never did, but this just makes these "supporters" look like dickheads.
Norwood had since moved on from the incidents v Port, this only puts them in a bad light.
Where was security?
by fester69 » Sun Apr 17, 2016 12:19 pm
by Magellan » Sun Apr 17, 2016 12:27 pm
whufc wrote:Scoop wrote:Private, plain clothes security guards? And what authority do they have over a member of the public? They'd just look like any other punter telling you to shut up - and should have just about as much power as them too. Other than getting between the precious, delicate AFL players and members of the public they shouldn't be able to do anything, surely. Or should that be, surely?
Agree, i reckon a plain clothes 'security' guard would do more damage than good.
An angry member of the public would probably just think their another member of the public and be incited by them trying to stop the trouble.
by whufc » Sun Apr 17, 2016 12:31 pm
Magellan wrote:whufc wrote:Scoop wrote:Private, plain clothes security guards? And what authority do they have over a member of the public? They'd just look like any other punter telling you to shut up - and should have just about as much power as them too. Other than getting between the precious, delicate AFL players and members of the public they shouldn't be able to do anything, surely. Or should that be, surely?
Agree, i reckon a plain clothes 'security' guard would do more damage than good.
An angry member of the public would probably just think their another member of the public and be incited by them trying to stop the trouble.
The last thing we want is a secret footy security police wandering around the ground. Whufc is right, it'd just look like a bogan starting a fight. And from what I've seen, Weslo's judgement in dealing with crowd issues is questionable.
by therisingblues » Sun Apr 17, 2016 5:48 pm
fester69 wrote:Glad the word allegedly was used.
Actually our guys had already gone into the rooms before Cornes left the ground, albeit escorted by his own personal Weslo guy!!
Couple of people further down from the race asked him if he wanted a tissue.
"My" group just smiled, said nothing and offered our hats. We weren't going to lower ourselves to his level.
Cornes looked up, then straight at the ground and down the race
Play on.
by cracka » Sun Apr 17, 2016 6:50 pm
fester69 wrote:Why would my account not be the truth??
by therisingblues » Sun Apr 17, 2016 6:52 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |