Media Park wrote:Grahaml wrote:Reichert or Hardy would have been the CHB options if Sibenaler wasn't playing.
Isn't it great to have so many old, slow, useless passengers in our side who manage to win premierships year after year?
Being a CD fan I assume that is sarcasm?
Mostly a montage of the facts been levelled at our playing group.
Jugs wrote:Grahaml wrote:Reichert or Hardy would have been the CHB options if Sibenaler wasn't playing.
Isn't it great to have so many old, slow, useless passengers in our side who manage to win premierships year after year?
Think Centrals lack of pace is a myth. Their tackling pressure was fast and intense yesterday.
Exactly correct. Don't need to be half a yard faster if you think half a second faster. Gowans still get into space better than most in the comp.
Dutchy wrote:Not talking about the physical role each of them play, many Dogs fans know what Im talking about.
But most know it's garbage. Footy doesn't reward the more "deserving". Richie probably worked harder than many far more decorated players and while he was richly rewarded compared to many, no doubt he "deserved" to play more than Sibenaler or Sutherland. So did Scott Lee, Gary Window and Roger Girdham. Footy isn't sentimental, it's ruthless. Took us 35 years to learn that. Glenelg still trying.