by The Sleeping Giant » Thu May 09, 2013 10:52 am
by Big Phil » Thu May 09, 2013 11:08 am
The Sleeping Giant wrote:Sanfl will get the gate. Westies will get the catering would be my guess.
by CENTURION » Thu May 09, 2013 11:38 am
by Brodlach » Thu May 09, 2013 11:43 am
CENTURION wrote:if this is the case, they should play the state game at a different ground every year, or is this already the deal.
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
by Big Phil » Thu May 09, 2013 2:34 pm
SANFL site wrote:SANFL
F: Meiklejohn, Wundke, Campbell
HF: Goldsworthy, Ainger, Beech
C: Jarrad, Schmidt, O’Hara
HB: Ferguson, Georgiou, Thomas
B: Caire, Tippett, Thring
R: Parry, Liddle, Boyd
INT: Gray, Suckling, Cross, Ryswyk
EMG: Coad, Beard
by Thunderstruck » Thu May 09, 2013 3:49 pm
by RB » Thu May 09, 2013 5:50 pm
by CENTURION » Thu May 09, 2013 8:51 pm
Brodlach wrote:CENTURION wrote:if this is the case, they should play the state game at a different ground every year, or is this already the deal.
Maybe they are as the last game was at Glenelg. Elizabeth is too far to play a state game at though
by The Sleeping Giant » Thu May 09, 2013 9:07 pm
by SDK » Thu May 09, 2013 9:22 pm
by CENTURION » Thu May 09, 2013 10:13 pm
The Sleeping Giant wrote:Its actually a longer drive.
by The Sleeping Giant » Thu May 09, 2013 10:37 pm
CENTURION wrote:The Sleeping Giant wrote:Its actually a longer drive.
wouldn't you come down via broken hill from QLD, or Pt. Wakefield, from the NT?
by JK » Thu May 09, 2013 10:41 pm
RB wrote:Still think Sumner should be in it, but otherwise a good side and one not without experience in state matches. The forward line looks like it could be a bit top heavy but I'm sure the selectors know a bit about the opposition. SA by 45 points.
by Brodlach » Thu May 09, 2013 10:50 pm
JK wrote:RB wrote:Still think Sumner should be in it, but otherwise a good side and one not without experience in state matches. The forward line looks like it could be a bit top heavy but I'm sure the selectors know a bit about the opposition. SA by 45 points.
I agree he's a gun at this level and blew Norwood away a few weeks back.
That said it always means you've got to find someone to boot out for them and I haven't seen enough of the other players to judge that.
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
by JK » Thu May 09, 2013 10:55 pm
Brodlach wrote:JK wrote:RB wrote:Still think Sumner should be in it, but otherwise a good side and one not without experience in state matches. The forward line looks like it could be a bit top heavy but I'm sure the selectors know a bit about the opposition. SA by 45 points.
I agree he's a gun at this level and blew Norwood away a few weeks back.
That said it always means you've got to find someone to boot out for them and I haven't seen enough of the other players to judge that.
Problem is who doesn't play then.
by Brodlach » Thu May 09, 2013 11:31 pm
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
by JK » Thu May 09, 2013 11:36 pm
Brodlach wrote:Lol nicely edited, just saying I would have played MacCreadie instead of Beech
by saintal » Fri May 10, 2013 12:19 am
by SABRE » Fri May 10, 2013 3:53 am
by CENTURION » Fri May 10, 2013 7:46 am
SABRE wrote:I'm disgusted by the feeble SANFL promotion for a state game !
We should have numerous anti-AFL banners around the ground IMHO.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |