dedja wrote:I'm not sure Norwood lost those 4 games by an average of 67 points though ...
About 14 goals in Round 1 from memory
by JK » Sun Apr 22, 2012 11:23 pm
dedja wrote:I'm not sure Norwood lost those 4 games by an average of 67 points though ...
by am Bays » Sun Apr 22, 2012 11:23 pm
goyouroosters wrote:I reckon North dropped their first 5 in 1992 after the 91 flag, and still somehow ended up with the double chance.
Someone else may like to verify that but I'm pretty confident.
Hang in there Eagles fans....
by dedja » Sun Apr 22, 2012 11:32 pm
JK wrote:dedja wrote:I'm not sure Norwood lost those 4 games by an average of 67 points though ...
About 14 goals in Round 1 from memory
by JK » Sun Apr 22, 2012 11:38 pm
dedja wrote:JK wrote:dedja wrote:I'm not sure Norwood lost those 4 games by an average of 67 points though ...
About 14 goals in Round 1 from memory
Nowhere near it ... was only 76 points.
by Reddeer » Mon Apr 23, 2012 12:08 am
by Brendan M » Mon Apr 23, 2012 1:07 am
by Booney » Mon Apr 23, 2012 9:08 am
Brendan M wrote:Thanks for those excellent stats Phil - we are not alone! Start of the year is very disappointing given our phenomenal finals campaign last year and the opportunity this year provides for consolidating our support. However, WWT's record in our 20 years is one of character and these circumstances will test all of that. Over-reaction and negativity is just wasted energy. The Port supporters are interesting in this regard, whatever we think about the fundamental weakness of the one/two Port Adelaides, many of them have stuck strongly in what is the weakest period in their history. That kind of loyalty is to be admired, and to sink the boots into WWT coaches, players, administrators now - 6 months after pulling off a remarkable and well-planned heist is a little short-sighted.
by robranisgod » Mon Apr 23, 2012 9:40 am
goyouroosters wrote:I reckon North dropped their first 5 in 1992 after the 91 flag, and still somehow ended up with the double chance.
Someone else may like to verify that but I'm pretty confident.
Hang in there Eagles fans....
by Dr Phil » Mon Apr 23, 2012 10:54 am
Reddeer wrote:Hasn't anyone heard of the handicap system. It evens up the competition so the previous lesser lights can get a look in. The Eagles are just doing that for everyone else as THE REIGNING PREMIERS
by FlyingHigh » Mon Apr 23, 2012 12:07 pm
Mr Fuller wrote:The issue is not injuries or retirements from last season. Only Parry and Powell are the main losses and I still think we would be losing even with them in the side. Eddy is unproven and was in poor form during the trials and first match so not telling whether he’ll be decent at this level. Tiller and Allmond were mostly terrible during last season and only hit decent form towards the end of the year and during finals. Treeby was great a few years ago but injury caught up and his form in the last few years steadily got worse so he was basically finished as a league player.
I don’t think it is necessarily Godden’s gameplan that is bad. We just don’t have the quality of players or depth anymore. Whether or not that is Goddens fault I am not sure. However I am firmly pointing the finger at Godden for not targeting the right areas. Two key questions need to be asked.
Question 1 – why have we not targeted a key forward to assist Grocke?
It is very simple. If you can’t kick goals you don’t win games. Aside from Grocke we do not have anyone capable of taking a mark in the forward line or anyone else that even knows where to run or position themselves. Godden has a lot to answer for in this regard in terms of failing to target a recruit to replace Passador when he retired a few years back. Rather than wasting money on Eddy (who is unlikely to be a 25+ possession recruit anyway) it would have been wiser to throw this money at the best key forward in the VFL, WAFL or whatever. Its not as if this issue has crept up slowly either. Each year for the past few years our average score has been getting smaller and smaller so that we now are unable to kick more than 7 goals a match. What we have been crying out for is a strong bodied marking forward rather than the skinny rangy tall that Godden seems to be introducing. Interesting watching the tv on Sat when ABC showed clips of the last final played against North and footy park a few years back. We had 3 big targets (Passador, Grocke, Salter). On the weekend our targets were Grocke, Rae and Staple. Failure to recruit has meant that Godden has been forced to play Grocke at FF when he plays his best footy as a CHF. Our current forward set-up is not exactly a forward line to strike fear into the opposition.
Question 2 – why do we only target former eagles recruits?
Its great when a former player returns to the club. However the question has to be asked whether they were actually needed or were just targeted because they are former eagles. Did we think Bock had potential before recruiting him? Was Hall going to be the dynamic rover we have been crying out for the last 10 years? Was Sumner going to be the speedy wingman? What role was Shirley going to play? Harding???? It seems to me that our recruiting staff (if we even have them) are not doing due diligence by checking to see whether these players can actually play at the level. If Godden had not actually seen them play then why not?
Unless we see some big improvements I honestly believe that Godden should voluntarily agree to step aside for the State Coaching role. I had my doubts at the start of the year but thought it might be ok as our team would be comfortably winning. The fact we aren’t means he must put every minute of his time into ensuring we start winning again. There should be no distractions that are caused by State team duties. The fact is that every minute he is training the State lads, he is not thinking about what should be his primary focus which is the Eagles. If the young kids are still learning then he should be made to spend extra time with them to teach them....minutes that will be lost if he is coaching the State team.
by whufc » Mon Apr 23, 2012 12:14 pm
by Reddeer » Mon Apr 23, 2012 12:19 pm
Dr Phil wrote:Reddeer wrote:Hasn't anyone heard of the handicap system. It evens up the competition so the previous lesser lights can get a look in. The Eagles are just doing that for everyone else as THE REIGNING PREMIERS
stop living in the past, your crap this year
by Brodlach » Mon Apr 23, 2012 12:21 pm
whufc wrote:Goddens quote on Adelaidenow Today.
"This Wednesday is a really awkward one. It's ANZAC Day, it's a passionate day and means a lot to a lot of people. It means a lot to our club. But no one is going to come now. No Eagles people are going to show up and rightly so. I'd imagine your Doggies fans will show because they'll want a bit of revenge from last year. I'm basically gearing myself for the South game in two weeks. So we'll train (Sunday), we'll train (Monday), we'll train Tuesday and if they're sore and they're tired on Wednesday then what's the difference? We're getting smashed anyway. We need to plan more advance because you can't turn things around in four days from a physical point of view. You can start to put the wheels in motion for the future."
Tactics or a bloke whose lost the plot?
What you think Eagles supporters?
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
by Big Phil » Mon Apr 23, 2012 12:23 pm
by Grahaml » Mon Apr 23, 2012 2:07 pm
Big Phil wrote:Reverse physcology from Micky G perhaps?
by The Apostle » Mon Apr 23, 2012 5:32 pm
by The Apostle » Mon Apr 23, 2012 5:44 pm
by Aerie » Mon Apr 23, 2012 7:19 pm
whufc wrote:Goddens quote on Adelaidenow Today.
"This Wednesday is a really awkward one. It's ANZAC Day, it's a passionate day and means a lot to a lot of people. It means a lot to our club. But no one is going to come now. No Eagles people are going to show up and rightly so. I'd imagine your Doggies fans will show because they'll want a bit of revenge from last year. I'm basically gearing myself for the South game in two weeks. So we'll train (Sunday), we'll train (Monday), we'll train Tuesday and if they're sore and they're tired on Wednesday then what's the difference? We're getting smashed anyway. We need to plan more advance because you can't turn things around in four days from a physical point of view. You can start to put the wheels in motion for the future."
Tactics or a bloke whose lost the plot?
What you think Eagles supporters?
by cd » Mon Apr 23, 2012 10:27 pm
by Squawk » Mon Apr 23, 2012 11:09 pm
FlyingHigh wrote:Mr Fuller wrote:The issue is not injuries or retirements from last season. Only Parry and Powell are the main losses and I still think we would be losing even with them in the side. Eddy is unproven and was in poor form during the trials and first match so not telling whether he’ll be decent at this level. Tiller and Allmond were mostly terrible during last season and only hit decent form towards the end of the year and during finals. Treeby was great a few years ago but injury caught up and his form in the last few years steadily got worse so he was basically finished as a league player.
I don’t think it is necessarily Godden’s gameplan that is bad. We just don’t have the quality of players or depth anymore. Whether or not that is Goddens fault I am not sure. However I am firmly pointing the finger at Godden for not targeting the right areas. Two key questions need to be asked.
Question 1 – why have we not targeted a key forward to assist Grocke?
It is very simple. If you can’t kick goals you don’t win games. Aside from Grocke we do not have anyone capable of taking a mark in the forward line or anyone else that even knows where to run or position themselves. Godden has a lot to answer for in this regard in terms of failing to target a recruit to replace Passador when he retired a few years back. Rather than wasting money on Eddy (who is unlikely to be a 25+ possession recruit anyway) it would have been wiser to throw this money at the best key forward in the VFL, WAFL or whatever. Its not as if this issue has crept up slowly either. Each year for the past few years our average score has been getting smaller and smaller so that we now are unable to kick more than 7 goals a match. What we have been crying out for is a strong bodied marking forward rather than the skinny rangy tall that Godden seems to be introducing. Interesting watching the tv on Sat when ABC showed clips of the last final played against North and footy park a few years back. We had 3 big targets (Passador, Grocke, Salter). On the weekend our targets were Grocke, Rae and Staple. Failure to recruit has meant that Godden has been forced to play Grocke at FF when he plays his best footy as a CHF. Our current forward set-up is not exactly a forward line to strike fear into the opposition.
Question 2 – why do we only target former eagles recruits?
Its great when a former player returns to the club. However the question has to be asked whether they were actually needed or were just targeted because they are former eagles. Did we think Bock had potential before recruiting him? Was Hall going to be the dynamic rover we have been crying out for the last 10 years? Was Sumner going to be the speedy wingman? What role was Shirley going to play? Harding???? It seems to me that our recruiting staff (if we even have them) are not doing due diligence by checking to see whether these players can actually play at the level. If Godden had not actually seen them play then why not?
Unless we see some big improvements I honestly believe that Godden should voluntarily agree to step aside for the State Coaching role. I had my doubts at the start of the year but thought it might be ok as our team would be comfortably winning. The fact we aren’t means he must put every minute of his time into ensuring we start winning again. There should be no distractions that are caused by State team duties. The fact is that every minute he is training the State lads, he is not thinking about what should be his primary focus which is the Eagles. If the young kids are still learning then he should be made to spend extra time with them to teach them....minutes that will be lost if he is coaching the State team.
Some good points and questions Mr Fuller, some I agree with, and some I don't.
Agree it's not injuries. Every club has them, our list is no worse than a club normally faces, except we were fortunate to go into last year's finals as good as could be, except Rowntree.
Agree Treeby was just about done, and think his efforts in the finals were a big last effort rather than showing he still had it. Agree re Tiller, but not about Allmond. Rimmingotn was another who had a reasonable last half of the year.
Regarding the key forward, I think they have made some efforts to do this - Welsh, Hentschel, with Fitzgerald who was unfortunately injured last year, and Heinjus who hasn't come on probably quite as hoped. Have a lot of time for Staple, but he probably still is a third forward at this stage. Perhaps even Dawson when he was cut from the Power
Regarding the second question, I don't think we only target former Eagles players as recruits - Raymond, Tiller, Welsh, Day, Greiger, Lewis, but perhaps the question is why do we automatically welcome these players back? It is hard, because if we don't give them a chance then we put a little chink in developing a strong club culture IMO, and we must be doing something right if they want to come back. Agree re Shirly, 30, two years at a lesser comp, never real quick, being put into an already slowish, aging mid-field. Honestly, with our real young reserves team, he'd be better off being playing coach at that level. I think Hall is still developing, and will be disappointed if he doesn't have a real break out year next year. Sumner, have only seen on Saturday on the telly, but if he wasn't drafted he would have been a far better league player two years ago than now. Prepared to give him a few more weeks though. Harding? Still only a kid.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |