by DOC » Wed Sep 07, 2016 11:55 am
by jo172 » Wed Sep 07, 2016 2:53 pm
by heater31 » Wed Sep 07, 2016 2:55 pm
jo172 wrote:You'd think a reasonable amount hinges on the availability of Brown, Smith, Cheney, Seedsman and Lowden.
If all come up the Ravens could field a 20 AFL listed squad, if all four/five miss it could be one of the weaker sides they put up over the course of the year
by darley16 » Wed Sep 07, 2016 3:53 pm
by Magellan » Wed Sep 07, 2016 4:06 pm
darley16 wrote:Panthers can win this, is it however somewhat dependent on the who's who in the opposition .
by blueandwhite » Wed Sep 07, 2016 4:24 pm
heater31 wrote:jo172 wrote:You'd think a reasonable amount hinges on the availability of Brown, Smith, Cheney, Seedsman and Lowden.
If all come up the Ravens could field a 20 AFL listed squad, if all four/five miss it could be one of the weaker sides they put up over the course of the year
Guess South won't have a clue if they are against it or not until they exchange the team sheets....
by matt35 » Wed Sep 07, 2016 4:24 pm
by therisingblues » Wed Sep 07, 2016 4:33 pm
by Magellan » Wed Sep 07, 2016 4:53 pm
therisingblues wrote:I really hate to see this happen, but with the talk of injuries I cannot see South winning this one.
Probably the second saddest day in SA football history so far, with the merging of W & WT being the saddest. With all the improvement South have achieved, given their history over the past 50 odd years, surely the fantastic season the Panthers have had so far deserves a better finish than going down to an AFL practice squad, who in all their protestations of innocence, would rather a good workout for their AFL hopefuls than actually winning it.
by southee » Wed Sep 07, 2016 5:51 pm
heater31 wrote:jo172 wrote:You'd think a reasonable amount hinges on the availability of Brown, Smith, Cheney, Seedsman and Lowden.
If all come up the Ravens could field a 20 AFL listed squad, if all four/five miss it could be one of the weaker sides they put up over the course of the year
Guess South won't have a clue if they are against it or not until they exchange the team sheets....
by VALE PARK » Wed Sep 07, 2016 7:49 pm
by Big Phil » Wed Sep 07, 2016 8:54 pm
VALE PARK wrote:I get a feeling we will get another 4 byes...
by daysofourlives » Wed Sep 07, 2016 9:02 pm
Big Phil wrote:VALE PARK wrote:I get a feeling we will get another 4 byes...
Will only be 3 byes next year, I'm hearing...
by LPH » Wed Sep 07, 2016 9:12 pm
by spell_check » Wed Sep 07, 2016 9:23 pm
daysofourlives wrote:Big Phil wrote:VALE PARK wrote:I get a feeling we will get another 4 byes...
Will only be 3 byes next year, I'm hearing...
So 3 up on what they promised when coming in
by VALE PARK » Wed Sep 07, 2016 9:45 pm
by therisingblues » Thu Sep 08, 2016 2:47 pm
VALE PARK wrote:So rumour now has it 3 byes in 2017 plus one?
Hopefully not with another bye for the state game,that would make 4 to me.
Call them what you like but 4 Saturday's without footy,
Effectively a whole month of no footy, a bad business model to me.
To me 10 teams = 5 games a week,
so why more than just 1 bye for a token state game?
if they must have one.
Declining attendances and memberships will roll on and on.
As Einstein said,
insanity,
'doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result'.
Good old SANFL more of the same into 2017 perhaps,
gee I hope not!
by therisingblues » Thu Sep 08, 2016 2:47 pm
by therisingblues » Thu Sep 08, 2016 2:47 pm
by another grub » Thu Sep 08, 2016 3:57 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |