by The Patriach » Wed Oct 09, 2013 1:36 pm
by Mr Fuller » Wed Oct 09, 2013 3:27 pm
by heater31 » Wed Oct 09, 2013 3:52 pm
Mr Fuller wrote:I did not think there was anything wrong with Footy Park. But if the Government was determined to throw away money on a new stadium they should have done it right. In 10 years people will be scratching their heads wondering why a fully enclosed stadium was not developed.
by therisingblues » Wed Oct 09, 2013 4:03 pm
by The Patriach » Wed Oct 09, 2013 4:51 pm
Mr Fuller wrote:Personally I think it looks ridiculous having grandstands surround 3/4 of the stadium with the remaining 1/4 left as grass on 'this hill'. The SA Government will try to pump it up as ‘forward thinking’ while the rest of the country will view it as yet another quaint Adelaide hybrid solution. Think the retractable lights, Southern Expressway etc.
I did not think there was anything wrong with Footy Park. But if the Government was determined to throw away money on a new stadium they should have done it right. In 10 years people will be scratching their heads wondering why a fully enclosed stadium was not developed.
by Hondo » Wed Oct 09, 2013 5:05 pm
heater31 wrote:Should have save the cash and built a proper one on Victoria Park!
by Mr Fuller » Wed Oct 09, 2013 5:32 pm
The Patriach wrote:Mr Fuller wrote:Personally I think it looks ridiculous having grandstands surround 3/4 of the stadium with the remaining 1/4 left as grass on 'this hill'. The SA Government will try to pump it up as ‘forward thinking’ while the rest of the country will view it as yet another quaint Adelaide hybrid solution. Think the retractable lights, Southern Expressway etc.
I did not think there was anything wrong with Footy Park. But if the Government was determined to throw away money on a new stadium they should have done it right. In 10 years people will be scratching their heads wondering why a fully enclosed stadium was not developed.
This mentality annoys me immensely. After construction is completed we'll have a world class stadium which is still relatively individual, rather than a generic concrete bowl that has no life. This ground is 100% what SA needs in terms of capacity, feature, standards and functionality. If you don't like it, please stay away and feel free to patronise all of the blockbuster games left at AAMI Stadium in the future
by Aerie » Wed Oct 09, 2013 5:53 pm
by PhilH » Wed Oct 09, 2013 6:30 pm
by therisingblues » Wed Oct 09, 2013 6:33 pm
Aerie wrote:I think it will be great. Glad they still have the grass. Will still be able to take the kids down to a Sheffield Shield day and have them run around. The Moreton Bay Figs give it a sense of enclosure anyway.
by Psyber » Wed Oct 09, 2013 7:06 pm
by The Sleeping Giant » Wed Oct 09, 2013 9:01 pm
by Footy Chick » Wed Oct 09, 2013 9:20 pm
The Sleeping Giant wrote:Ye olde tight arse has spoketh.
Gatt_Weasel wrote:if they (Walkerville) dont win the flag ill run around the block of my street naked :) you can grab a chair and enjoy the view
by The Sleeping Giant » Wed Oct 09, 2013 9:54 pm
by southee » Wed Oct 09, 2013 10:34 pm
by Rik E Boy » Wed Oct 09, 2013 10:39 pm
by Rik E Boy » Wed Oct 09, 2013 10:40 pm
Psyber wrote:Adelaide Oval? ho-hum...
I'm unlikely to ever go there - parking is going to be hopeless from what I've read, and bussing it is likely to be impractical for me.
For anything I do need to attend to in the CBD I try to drive to Parkside than bus it in the rest of the way, rather than get ripped off for the parking.
I could go by bus on my Seniors Card for free but it takes too long, and it is easier for me to just drive to Marion or Mount Barker instead.
by Blackwhite » Wed Oct 09, 2013 10:46 pm
Mr Fuller wrote:Personally I think it looks ridiculous having grandstands surround 3/4 of the stadium with the remaining 1/4 left as grass on 'this hill'. The SA Government will try to pump it up as ‘forward thinking’ while the rest of the country will view it as yet another quaint Adelaide hybrid solution. Think the retractable lights, Southern Expressway etc.
I did not think there was anything wrong with Footy Park. But if the Government was determined to throw away money on a new stadium they should have done it right. In 10 years people will be scratching their heads wondering why a fully enclosed stadium was not developed.
by the wonder elephant » Wed Oct 09, 2013 11:43 pm
Blackwhite wrote:Mr Fuller wrote:Personally I think it looks ridiculous having grandstands surround 3/4 of the stadium with the remaining 1/4 left as grass on 'this hill'. The SA Government will try to pump it up as ‘forward thinking’ while the rest of the country will view it as yet another quaint Adelaide hybrid solution. Think the retractable lights, Southern Expressway etc.
I did not think there was anything wrong with Footy Park. But if the Government was determined to throw away money on a new stadium they should have done it right. In 10 years people will be scratching their heads wondering why a fully enclosed stadium was not developed.
What's wrong with the grass on the hill? It is fantastic!
by prowling panther » Thu Oct 10, 2013 12:23 am
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |