by Harry the Horse » Mon Nov 05, 2012 3:57 pm
by beenreal » Mon Nov 05, 2012 4:38 pm
by CENTURION » Mon Nov 05, 2012 4:45 pm
beenreal wrote:Here's a Petition worth signing;
http://Www.stopthetailwaggingthedog.com
OR
http://Www.letsmoveintothe21stcentury.com
by FOURTH ESTATE » Mon Nov 05, 2012 6:11 pm
by UK Fan » Mon Nov 05, 2012 7:10 pm
beenreal wrote:Here's a Petition worth signing;
http://Www.stopthetailwaggingthedog.com
OR
http://Www.letsmoveintothe21stcentury.com
fester69 wrote: I'm full of "pish and wind" !!You can call me weak !!
MW wrote: Well call me a special asshole!.
Booney wrote: I'm a happy clapper **** stick.
by topsywaldron » Mon Nov 05, 2012 8:39 pm
by holden78 » Tue Nov 06, 2012 8:03 am
topsywaldron wrote:I love how some Port supporters carry on like they're in a position to lord it over anything or anyone.
It's truly hilarious.
by Barto » Tue Nov 06, 2012 9:07 am
beenreal wrote:Here's a Petition worth signing;
http://Www.stopthetailwaggingthedog.com
OR
http://Www.letsmoveintothe21stcentury.com
by Mr Beefy » Tue Nov 06, 2012 9:35 am
by CENTURION » Tue Nov 06, 2012 11:23 am
holden78 wrote:topsywaldron wrote:I love how some Port supporters carry on like they're in a position to lord it over anything or anyone.
It's truly hilarious.
by Psyber » Tue Nov 06, 2012 1:45 pm
and become the "Whitless Wanderers".CENTURION wrote:"Broke, surviving on handouts......"holden78 wrote:topsywaldron wrote:I love how some Port supporters carry on like they're in a position to lord it over anything or anyone.
It's truly hilarious.
maybe they should relocate to Whitmore Square!
by Grahaml » Tue Nov 06, 2012 3:54 pm
topsywaldron wrote:I love how some Port supporters carry on like they're in a position to lord it over anything or anyone.
It's truly hilarious.
by topsywaldron » Tue Nov 06, 2012 5:44 pm
by Psyber » Tue Nov 06, 2012 5:53 pm
What "legal imperative"??topsywaldron wrote:Leigh Whicker on the radio before, 'we have a legal imperative to make sure the PAFC remain solvent' A telling insight into the real position of the failed organization and a statement that makes a mockery of the supposed SANFL fatwa against the mob in teal. They're the only thing between Port and bankruptcy, financial anyway, they've been morally bankrupt for years
Anyway, I reckon Whicker's a misguided pr*ck, let the basta*rdsK drown.
(with apologies to the sensible, intelligent Port supporters who are currently meeting in a phonebox)
by RustyCage » Tue Nov 06, 2012 5:56 pm
Psyber wrote:What "legal imperative"??topsywaldron wrote:Leigh Whicker on the radio before, 'we have a legal imperative to make sure the PAFC remain solvent' A telling insight into the real position of the failed organization and a statement that makes a mockery of the supposed SANFL fatwa against the mob in teal. They're the only thing between Port and bankruptcy, financial anyway, they've been morally bankrupt for years
Anyway, I reckon Whicker's a misguided pr*ck, let the basta*rdsK drown.
(with apologies to the sensible, intelligent Port supporters who are currently meeting in a phonebox)
Is he suggesting that the SANFL, at some time, signed a contract, either with Port Adelaide or with the AFL, guaranteeing to not let them fold?
by SDK » Tue Nov 06, 2012 6:51 pm
by therisingblues » Tue Nov 06, 2012 7:06 pm
SDK wrote:What annoys me is they continue to try and prop up Port Power when it is 100% certain that club will fail within the next 3 to 5 years. You can not survive when you lose money every time you play football.
Adelaide Oval will NOT save Port Power because the novelty will wear off quickly when Port Power continue to lose and play shit football.
The licence should go to Tasmania and have just one team here.
by Psyber » Tue Nov 06, 2012 7:20 pm
Yes, when the second licence was being discussed I was hoping for that, and was planning to take out membership if it happened.therisingblues wrote:SDK wrote:What annoys me is they continue to try and prop up Port Power when it is 100% certain that club will fail within the next 3 to 5 years. You can not survive when you lose money every time you play football.
Adelaide Oval will NOT save Port Power because the novelty will wear off quickly when Port Power continue to lose and play shit football.
The licence should go to Tasmania and have just one team here.
Over one million people in a football mad state cannot support more than one AFL side?
Surely the answer isn't the number of teams, 2 are manageable, perhaps Port should have tried to form a cartel of Western suburbs teams: maybe Woodville, Torrens, West Adelaide and Port should have gone in together. They could have lured Blighty to coach them then, and AFL history in this state would be completely different. Not just that though. A properly named, packaged consortium representing a broader spectrum of SA and not just Port people, would obviously appeal more as an alternative to the Crows.
by locky801 » Tue Nov 06, 2012 7:30 pm
FOURTH ESTATE wrote:Seaton Ramblers will now go broke with no car parking money once the AFL goes to Adelaide Oval shall we start a petition for them?
by Psyber » Tue Nov 06, 2012 7:37 pm
Jeez they were ****** stupid if they did that, weren't they?!pafc1870 wrote: Yeah they did, with the AFL, not to let either the Crows or Port fold. Obviously the crows won't, and Port are safe for the duration of that agreement, which will end once the afl take over the rights to the clubs.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |