by Wedgie » Mon Apr 09, 2012 10:46 am
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by Jim05 » Mon Apr 09, 2012 10:54 am
by NO-MERCY » Mon Apr 09, 2012 11:17 am
by The Sleeping Giant » Mon Apr 09, 2012 12:31 pm
by SDK » Mon Apr 09, 2012 1:32 pm
by Jim05 » Mon Apr 09, 2012 2:02 pm
SDK wrote:Phillips HAS to go to the Power, Pfiefer probably will but Renouf not just yet.
With or without the above players Norwood should have enough depth to cover those losses.
Good to see the traditional rivals in form and playing well.
Norwood in a typical tough fight that we always see.
by SDK » Mon Apr 09, 2012 4:48 pm
by devilsadvocate » Mon Apr 09, 2012 7:09 pm
SDK wrote:Maybe but Renouf might be just a bit under done at this stage.
Don't follow Port Pawpers much at all so don't really know how their rucks are doing. Can not watch Port play absolute crap to watch that shit.
by Spargo » Mon Apr 09, 2012 11:06 pm
SDK wrote:Good to see the traditional rivals in form and playing well.
by SDK » Tue Apr 10, 2012 5:18 pm
by DOC » Tue Apr 10, 2012 6:25 pm
Spargo wrote:SDK wrote:Good to see the traditional rivals in form and playing well.
Losing to strut then kicking only 7 goals in a nothing comp hardly constitutes form....
by Spargo » Tue Apr 10, 2012 10:46 pm
DOC wrote:Spargo wrote:SDK wrote:Good to see the traditional rivals in form and playing well.
Losing to strut then kicking only 7 goals in a nothing comp hardly constitutes form....
Might have only kicked seven but they won by more than 2 goals. They played a young team to provide opportunities against a full strength Subiaco. This game should be good.
by Booney » Wed Apr 11, 2012 9:16 am
Jim05 wrote:
Depends on how much the Power shaft us to look after their little brother. No doubt they will take Renouf, Pfeiff and Flip this week.
Still think we will edge them in a close one
by devilsadvocate » Wed Apr 11, 2012 9:36 am
SDK wrote:Any game at any time regardless of where the teams sit on the table is always 50/50 between Norwood and Port.
by The Sleeping Giant » Wed Apr 11, 2012 9:41 am
SDK wrote:Any game at any time regardless of where the teams sit on the table is always 50/50 between Norwood and Port.
by Slots It Through » Wed Apr 11, 2012 10:08 am
Jim05 wrote:Depends on how much the Power shaft us to look after their little brother. No doubt they will take Renouf, Pfeiff and Flip this week.
Still think we will edge them in a close one
by Booney » Wed Apr 11, 2012 10:20 am
Slots It Through wrote:Jim05 wrote:Depends on how much the Power shaft us to look after their little brother. No doubt they will take Renouf, Pfeiff and Flip this week.
Still think we will edge them in a close one
Yes they always consider the magpies when doing selection, like last season when they dropped Daniel Stewart back to North to play against port. Stewart kicked 7 or 8. Or at the end of last season when they ruled out Burcher, Surjan and Ebert from playing in the finals if the Magpies had made it. Or even last week, when they took Banner as the travelling emergency so he couldnt play in the Foxtel Cup.
by Psyber » Wed Apr 11, 2012 11:00 am
That would give Port a slight chance I guess...The Sleeping Giant wrote:hope Norwood do lose the players mentioned, and Daniel Stewart gets dropped.
by The Sleeping Giant » Wed Apr 11, 2012 12:14 pm
by beenreal » Wed Apr 11, 2012 1:17 pm
Spargo wrote:DOC wrote:Spargo wrote:SDK wrote:Good to see the traditional rivals in form and playing well.
Losing to strut then kicking only 7 goals in a nothing comp hardly constitutes form....
Might have only kicked seven but they won by more than 2 goals. They played a young team to provide opportunities against a full strength Subiaco. This game should be good.
I hope that by not playing a full strength side you're not suggesting the pams aren't taking this reveered comp seriously (like Subiaco)
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |