Sturt were all over South today.
Sturt 21.16
South 3.5
Rd 22 Sturt v South review
25 posts
• Page 1 of 2 • 1, 2
Rd 22 Sturt v South review
by MightyEagles » Sun Aug 31, 2008 5:33 pm
WOOOOO, Premiers 1993, 2006 and 2011!
Eagles - P 528 W 320 L 205 D 3 W% 60.89
WFC - P 575 W 160 L 411 D 4 W% 28.17
WTFC - P 1568 W 702 L 841 D 25 W% 45.56
Total - P 2671 W 1183 L 1457 D 32 W% 44.88
3 Flags - 1 Club
Eagles - P 528 W 320 L 205 D 3 W% 60.89
WFC - P 575 W 160 L 411 D 4 W% 28.17
WTFC - P 1568 W 702 L 841 D 25 W% 45.56
Total - P 2671 W 1183 L 1457 D 32 W% 44.88
3 Flags - 1 Club
- MightyEagles
- Coach
-
- Posts: 11771
- Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2005 3:38 pm
- Location: The MightyEagles Memorial Timekeepers Box
- Has liked: 10 times
- Been liked: 12 times
- Grassroots Team: United Eagles
Re: Rd 22 Sturt v South review
by Blue Boy » Sun Aug 31, 2008 5:45 pm
Great win boys
How many did Chambo finish with ???
How many did Chambo finish with ???
It is what it is !!!
Re: Rd 22 Sturt v South review
by sturtpeter » Sun Aug 31, 2008 5:49 pm
4 
goals.
Fantastic team performance by a very classy outfit.
Final margin 121 points.
Bring on Central
goals.Fantastic team performance by a very classy outfit.
Final margin 121 points.
Bring on Central
Avid Sturt supporter and SANFL fanatic.
-
sturtpeter - League - Best 21
-
- Posts: 1680
- Joined: Fri Nov 04, 2005 9:11 am
- Location: Parkside SA
- Has liked: 3 times
- Been liked: 4 times
- Grassroots Team: Glenunga
Re: Rd 22 Sturt v South review
by smac » Sun Aug 31, 2008 6:23 pm
Centurion breathes a big sigh of relief... 
Re: Rd 22 Sturt v South review
by CENTURION » Sun Aug 31, 2008 8:30 pm
smac wrote:Centurion breathes a big sigh of relief...
I don't know, was sort of looking forward to it a bit!
Member No. 988 & PROUD to sponsor The CDFC!!
Re: Rd 22 Sturt v South review
by Sojourner » Sun Aug 31, 2008 9:39 pm
Thank God its finally over.... 
Steamranger, South Australia's best ever Tourist Attraction, Treat Yourself, Let your Money Buy you Happiness!!!
Re: Rd 22 Sturt v South review
by prowling panther » Sun Aug 31, 2008 10:23 pm
A timely time for a bye 
I wish my remembering was as good as my forgetting
-
prowling panther - League Bench Warmer
-
- Posts: 1353
- Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 1:04 am
- Has liked: 90 times
- Been liked: 28 times
- Grassroots Team: Hectorville
Re: Rd 22 Sturt v South review
by Cambridge Clarrie » Sun Aug 31, 2008 10:52 pm
A very sorry performance by the Panthers...
Sturt were ruthless with winners in every position.
How can Panthers supporters go into 09 with any hope? Surely they're favourites for next years wooden spoon...
How about Thring's goal tight against the boundary at the bowling club end!
Sturt were ruthless with winners in every position.
How can Panthers supporters go into 09 with any hope? Surely they're favourites for next years wooden spoon...
How about Thring's goal tight against the boundary at the bowling club end!
"They do say, Mrs M, that verbal insults hurt more than physical pain. They are, of course, wrong, as you will soon discover when I stick this toasting fork into your head"
-
Cambridge Clarrie - League - Best 21
-
- Posts: 1702
- Joined: Mon May 28, 2007 10:33 am
- Location: Asleep in the Unley Oval pirate ship...
- Has liked: 16 times
- Been liked: 31 times
Re: Rd 22 Sturt v South review
by purch » Mon Sep 01, 2008 12:13 am
Cambridge Clarrie wrote:A very sorry performance by the Panthers...
Round 22, 2008
League + Reserves + U19s =
Sturt 77-68 (530)
South 13-17 (95)
Surely this is some kind of record?? Spelly?
p.s. I'm trusting ZZ's maths here...
"And look at John Halbert"
" His whiskers have curled."
" His whiskers have curled."
Re: Rd 22 Sturt v South review
by spell_check » Mon Sep 01, 2008 12:28 am
purch wrote:Cambridge Clarrie wrote:A very sorry performance by the Panthers...
Round 22, 2008
League + Reserves + U19s =
Sturt 77-68 (530)
South 13-17 (95)
Surely this is some kind of record?? Spelly?
p.s. I'm trusting ZZ's maths here...
It would take me a while to do just those three grades, but if you add the other match to it - the Round 11, Under 17 match, which saw Sturt win 12.13 (85) to 9.8 (62), that would be easier to work out.
88.81 (615) to 22.25 (157) - the 615 fails by one point to beat the Sturt/South record aggregate 92.64 (616) was scored in Round 21 1985. But the combined margin 458 points; is a club record, beating the 451 point margin between Sturt and Woodville in Round 7 1984. 117.78 (780) to 46.53 (329).
- spell_check
- Coach
-
- Posts: 18817
- Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 11:56 pm
- Has liked: 48 times
- Been liked: 226 times
Re: Rd 22 Sturt v South review
by therisingblues » Mon Sep 01, 2008 1:08 am
Being a Sunday match, and non-televised meant I had a rare opportunity to listen in today.
Very satisfying to hear them really finish a side off. It was only two years ago that South did Sturt by over a tonne on the same ground, so the payback was sweet.
Sounds as though we had our form together pretty well today, though we still have some kinks to iron out. Some decision making in front of goal needs some attention, as the commentary team noted a couple of times players blazed away when there were better options.
It also sounds as though South's skills really let them down at times, some promising linking plays were often let down by a bad kick in to the forward lines. It must have sapped their spirit.
Finally, I have never heard a commentary team "barracking" for a player so much as they seemed to be for Chambo today. One of them claimed to have had his running shoes on ready to run out and do an interview after he got the tonne, if he got it. Made me cringe a little bit. Crowd invasion is one thing, but mid-quarter interviews shoud be saved for legends exhibition games.
A coule of players still to come back in, pretty happy tonight!
Very satisfying to hear them really finish a side off. It was only two years ago that South did Sturt by over a tonne on the same ground, so the payback was sweet.
Sounds as though we had our form together pretty well today, though we still have some kinks to iron out. Some decision making in front of goal needs some attention, as the commentary team noted a couple of times players blazed away when there were better options.
It also sounds as though South's skills really let them down at times, some promising linking plays were often let down by a bad kick in to the forward lines. It must have sapped their spirit.
Finally, I have never heard a commentary team "barracking" for a player so much as they seemed to be for Chambo today. One of them claimed to have had his running shoes on ready to run out and do an interview after he got the tonne, if he got it. Made me cringe a little bit. Crowd invasion is one thing, but mid-quarter interviews shoud be saved for legends exhibition games.
A coule of players still to come back in, pretty happy tonight!
I'm gonna sit back, crack the top off a Pale Ale, and watch the Double Blues prevail
1915, 1919, 1926, 1932, 1940, 1966, 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1974, 1976, 2002, 2016, 2017
1915, 1919, 1926, 1932, 1940, 1966, 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1974, 1976, 2002, 2016, 2017
-
therisingblues - Coach
-
- Posts: 6190
- Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 12:50 am
- Location: Fukuoka
- Has liked: 369 times
- Been liked: 514 times
- Grassroots Team: Hope Valley
Re: Rd 22 Sturt v South review
by Bluedemon » Mon Sep 01, 2008 7:14 am
south's performance was very average but McGowan did praise Sampson for the hard work he has done so far and to keep his chin up and things will improve. Sturt were in a similar way a couple of years ago.
SAFooty.net, where you hear the community football news first
Re: Rd 22 Sturt v South review
by saintal » Mon Sep 01, 2008 8:12 am
Bloody disgusting effort. Impossible to find a single positive. Maybe Crabb.
Sturt are a well oiled machine atm.
Sturt are a well oiled machine atm.
SAFC- 60 years...
StKFC- 58 years..
StKFC- 58 years..
Re: Rd 22 Sturt v South review
by godoubleblues » Mon Sep 01, 2008 8:16 am
Cambridge Clarrie wrote:How about Thring's goal tight against the boundary at the bowling club end!
that was a ripper goal, although we did boo him for not looking for Chambo
-
godoubleblues - Coach
-
- Posts: 6063
- Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 9:16 am
- Location: Littlehampton
- Has liked: 0 time
- Been liked: 0 time
- Grassroots Team: Millicent
Re: Rd 22 Sturt v South review
by MightyEagles » Mon Sep 01, 2008 9:23 am
Cambridge Clarrie wrote:A very sorry performance by the Panthers...
Sturt were ruthless with winners in every position.
How can Panthers supporters go into 09 with any hope? Surely they're favourites for next years wooden spoon...
How about Thring's goal tight against the boundary at the bowling club end!
If a certain coach and Club didn't part ways, things could be different and the club could have finished in the 5.
WOOOOO, Premiers 1993, 2006 and 2011!
Eagles - P 528 W 320 L 205 D 3 W% 60.89
WFC - P 575 W 160 L 411 D 4 W% 28.17
WTFC - P 1568 W 702 L 841 D 25 W% 45.56
Total - P 2671 W 1183 L 1457 D 32 W% 44.88
3 Flags - 1 Club
Eagles - P 528 W 320 L 205 D 3 W% 60.89
WFC - P 575 W 160 L 411 D 4 W% 28.17
WTFC - P 1568 W 702 L 841 D 25 W% 45.56
Total - P 2671 W 1183 L 1457 D 32 W% 44.88
3 Flags - 1 Club
- MightyEagles
- Coach
-
- Posts: 11771
- Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2005 3:38 pm
- Location: The MightyEagles Memorial Timekeepers Box
- Has liked: 10 times
- Been liked: 12 times
- Grassroots Team: United Eagles
Re: Rd 22 Sturt v South review
by southee » Mon Sep 01, 2008 5:48 pm
MightyEagles wrote:Cambridge Clarrie wrote:A very sorry performance by the Panthers...
Sturt were ruthless with winners in every position.
How can Panthers supporters go into 09 with any hope? Surely they're favourites for next years wooden spoon...
How about Thring's goal tight against the boundary at the bowling club end!
If a certain coach and Club didn't part ways, things could be different and the club could have finished in the 5.
Cant argue with that!!! Totally agree......
Is out of change.....thanks Cambridge Clarrie!!!
Re: Rd 22 Sturt v South review
by sturtpeter » Mon Sep 01, 2008 6:31 pm
Looking forward to catching up with Sam, Benny Posty etc at Elizabeth next Sat.
Go Sturt!!
Go Sturt!!
Avid Sturt supporter and SANFL fanatic.
-
sturtpeter - League - Best 21
-
- Posts: 1680
- Joined: Fri Nov 04, 2005 9:11 am
- Location: Parkside SA
- Has liked: 3 times
- Been liked: 4 times
- Grassroots Team: Glenunga
Re: Rd 22 Sturt v South review
by dash61 » Mon Sep 01, 2008 6:34 pm
Cambridge Clarrie wrote:A very sorry performance by the Panthers...
Sturt were ruthless with winners in every position.
How can Panthers supporters go into 09 with any hope? Surely they're favourites for next years wooden spoon...
How about Thring's goal tight against the boundary at the bowling club end!
In fairness to South Adelaide, they are trying kids and its hard to really gauge a result like that when clay sampson would be trying most of his list to see where its at and who he needs to recruit over the summer
Question to the South's supporters (What are your thoughts on high profile recruit "Ian Prendergast" after 2 seasons down South?????
Last edited by dash61 on Mon Sep 01, 2008 6:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- dash61
Re: Rd 22 Sturt v South review
by sturtpeter » Mon Sep 01, 2008 6:36 pm
Agree.
Keep Clay plz.
Keep Clay plz.
Avid Sturt supporter and SANFL fanatic.
-
sturtpeter - League - Best 21
-
- Posts: 1680
- Joined: Fri Nov 04, 2005 9:11 am
- Location: Parkside SA
- Has liked: 3 times
- Been liked: 4 times
- Grassroots Team: Glenunga
25 posts
• Page 1 of 2 • 1, 2
Football SANFL
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests
Advertisements by Advertisement Management