pickard drops offer

All discussions to do with the SANFL

Re: pickard drops offer

Postby Macca19 » Tue Feb 16, 2010 12:51 am

It is true that if you are part of the AFLs fund or "life support" then you are meant to have a limited salary cap. The minimum every club must use is 92.5% regardless.

To my knowledge, Port have been fairly significantly under the cap over the past 2 seasons anyway.
Macca19
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 1961
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 10:54 pm
Has liked: 5 times
Been liked: 10 times
Grassroots Team: Ports

Re: pickard drops offer

Postby TimmiesChin » Tue Feb 16, 2010 8:20 am

Dutchy wrote:
Constance_Perm wrote:
hondo71 wrote:CP, I thought all AFL clubs had to spend at least 90% of the whatever the cap is for that year? Thinking being that players shouldn't be disadvantaged by getting drafted into a less financial club. I don't think there's a link to any hand-outs they might have received.


Ah ok ... It was always my understanding (probably wrongly) that when clubs received AFL assistance they could only operate to %92.5 of the Salary Cap?


yep spot on.

hereselmo1 wrote:Yes but remember also that the melbourne teams have a huge advantage in terms of away team support.

Port and Adelaide only get great away team support once a year (showdowns) whilst Melbourne clubs get it every second game.


But the Melbourne clubs dont have a true home ground like interstate clubs skip ;)


But 9 games out of 15 the Melbourne clubs dont play true away games either.
TimmiesChin
Under 18s
 
 
Posts: 628
Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2006 12:22 pm
Has liked: 11 times
Been liked: 14 times

Previous

Board index   Football  SANFL

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 26 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |