by has been » Sun Nov 29, 2009 6:36 pm
by spell_check » Sun Nov 29, 2009 7:08 pm
by nickname » Mon Nov 30, 2009 8:15 am
has been wrote:Speaking to a fellow over the weekend who is involved in recruiting with a club from over the border and he told us that it will be a rarity for a player from SA to get drafted straight from our under 18 comp as they view it as second rate due to the fact so many young kids are pushed into it lowering the standard. They cannot understand why when we had a comp similar to TAC in the under 19's here that we changed for no reason. They think kids like young Howard from Glenelg will be a rarity. Funny how Mr Phillips tried to take the credit. Not very popular over there but I don't know why. This guy also stated when asked about young Panos that no one was interested due to the culture created at the norwood footy club in its junior grades. Said it was non productive - told us to make of that what we wanted but indicated the perceived culture was poor due to the coaching standards that where in place. Seemed a bit harsh as the 16's where ok. Also said we would not get the 20 drafeted next year as predicted and we cannot be happy with nine this year as the so called second footy state. Made some relevant points. Time will tell.
by ferret » Mon Nov 30, 2009 10:57 am
by sjt » Mon Nov 30, 2009 11:19 am
magpie in the 80's wrote:I to did a quick count from 2000 -2009 National draft and got the following
Port 19
West 17
Glenelg 16
Centrals 14
WWT 14
North 13
Norwood 8
Sturt 7
South 4
by Psyber » Mon Nov 30, 2009 11:43 am
by ferret » Mon Nov 30, 2009 12:55 pm
by supercoach » Tue Dec 01, 2009 8:36 am
by Big Phil » Tue Dec 01, 2009 1:38 pm
Wedgie wrote:Anyone know how the amount of kids picked up in the main draft from SA compares to other years?
by redandblack » Tue Dec 01, 2009 2:31 pm
supercoach wrote:Hey nickname the codswallop the has been is saying is true. There was a guy on the radio on talkback over the weekend discussing the same issue and the main theme was the fact that the 18's comp here is no where near the TAC and never will be. I think he said he was a scout for geelong and he also made the point that whatever you did with kids it was not until they started to develpop at 18 that really counted. How many guns do you see at 14 that don't grow and hence don't get the opportunities. The point he made was under 19 here was closer in standard overall to TAC - simple as that. Unless someone is a boy in a mans body and developed (like trengove) then they simply won't get looked at. Proof is in the pudding so far. We are starting to see that the changes made to our junior comp may not be the fruit that certain individuals state. What may benefit 1-2 individual standout players has effected the rest. Those players would have stood out anyway and been drafted. Interesting subject though. Time will tell.
by Macca19 » Tue Dec 01, 2009 3:06 pm
by doggies4eva » Tue Dec 01, 2009 3:28 pm
by Punk Rooster » Tue Dec 01, 2009 8:45 pm
has been wrote:Speaking to a fellow over the weekend who is involved in recruiting with a club from over the border and he told us that it will be a rarity for a player from SA to get drafted straight from our under 18 comp as they view it as second rate due to the fact so many young kids are pushed into it lowering the standard. They cannot understand why when we had a comp similar to TAC in the under 19's here that we changed for no reason. They think kids like young Howard from Glenelg will be a rarity. Funny how Mr Phillips tried to take the credit. Not very popular over there but I don't know why. This guy also stated when asked about young Panos that no one was interested due to the culture created at the norwood footy club in its junior grades. Said it was non productive - told us to make of that what we wanted but indicated the perceived culture was poor due to the coaching standards that where in place. Seemed a bit harsh as the 16's where ok. Also said we would not get the 20 drafeted next year as predicted and we cannot be happy with nine this year as the so called second footy state. Made some relevant points. Time will tell.
Ralph Wiggum wrote:That's where I saw the leprechaun. He told me to burn things
by JK » Tue Dec 01, 2009 9:21 pm
Macca19 wrote:The reason Panos wasnt drafted has nothing to do with Norwood, and everything to do with the fact hes a simple Lead-Mark-Kick forward with questionable athleticism and diversity. Every year theres a KPP whos rated highly pre-draft only for people to scratch their head when said KPP is either drafted really rate, drafted in the rookie draft or not drafted at all. Gourdis, Grundy, Kirkby, Thursfield, Gayfer, Cornelius, White, Sibosado were all rated as possible first round picks pre draft and all slid down the draft order. Gayfer wasnt even drafted at all. None of them have showed why they were originally rated so highly. Then theres the fact that each year Port and Adelaide get linked to local players for no other reason than they are local. Every man and his dog had Panos going to Port at one of their picks. 'They need a forward, hes a local, it fits'. Obviously it didnt fit.
AFL clubs want players that can play in multiple roles, maybe switch from either side of the ground. They want players with great athleticism and great endurance. From all ive heard, Panos isnt that sort of player.
He'll get picked up in the rookie draft, possibly by Port anyway. But his falling has nothing to do with Norwoods 'culture'.
by milbo » Sun Dec 13, 2009 6:21 pm
by lachlan » Sun Dec 13, 2009 6:28 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |