Guilty Findings at the Tribunal in the 09 Minor Round

All discussions to do with the SANFL

Re: Guilty Findings at the Tribunal in the 09 Minor Round

Postby Wedgie » Thu Oct 01, 2009 8:07 pm

aceman wrote:
aceman wrote:
Wedgie wrote:West & Port - 5
Glenelg & Sturt - 3
Eagles - 2
Central and Norwood - 1
North and South - zero

Congratulations to North and South for having the fairest teams on the park in 2009! :D



Wedgie, just for interest sake, how did the "reports" stack up? Can you put that up too?



Got it, interesting!

Port 9
West 6
Sturt & Glenelg 4
North, Norwood,Eagles,South & Centrals 2

Not really, someone who is found not guilty of a report is no different to someone who wasn't reported in the first place and a completely irrelevent stat IMHO. (Not that my original stat wasn't irrelevent but its more relevent than that one! lol)
The only interest that the "who got reported" list compared to the "who got games" list has is seeing how many time the umpires stuffed up in a report they made which shouldn't have been made.
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
User avatar
Wedgie
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 51721
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:00 am
Has liked: 2153 times
Been liked: 4093 times
Grassroots Team: Noarlunga

Previous

Board index   Football  SANFL

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 36 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |