MagareyLegend wrote:Bayman (& others) - it is called sub judice and is one of the key principles upon which the laws of our land are based.
I must admit when I read his comments I thought ignorance at best - dumb at worst. Unfortunately for him though ignorance (or dumbness) is no excuse for the law.
sub judice
In law, sub judice, Latin for "under judgment," means that a particular case or matter is currently under trial or being considered by a judge or court.
In England and Wales, New Zealand, Australia, India, Pakistan and Canada it is generally considered inappropriate to comment publicly on cases sub judice, which can be an offence in itself, leading to contempt of court proceedings. This is particularly true in criminal cases, where publicly discussing cases sub judice may constitute interference with due process.
Therefore, what he has done is, he has practically ensured that Shirley has to get off.
Since when was a football tribunal hearing a court? Getting a bit ahead of ourselves aren't we?