by Sojourner » Sun Mar 29, 2009 6:11 pm
by A Mum » Sun Mar 29, 2009 6:24 pm
by southee » Sun Mar 29, 2009 6:53 pm
A Mum wrote:South Adelaide website says 'a vote was taken by the members' as Sojourner says above, he as a member voted against it,
Yet, I haven't heard one South Adelaide/Panthers supporter say they like the change.
I wonder what the actual vote count was ??
by Pseudo » Sun Mar 29, 2009 8:47 pm
by Brucetiki » Sun Mar 29, 2009 9:06 pm
Pseudo wrote:In breaking news, South Adel... sorry, The Panthers (tm) will be updating their guernsey to reflect the recent change in nomenclature:safc_edit2.JPG
by poohbear » Sun Mar 29, 2009 10:26 pm
by bayman » Sun Mar 29, 2009 10:42 pm
poohbear wrote:One thing that i fail to understand in regards to this matter is the underlying reason as to why a change was important. In all honesty has a change of name ever taken a team from second to bottom to top? I cannot for the life of me understand why the club would even bother thinking about it as it is obviously evident there are more pressing issues, ie. winning games....
by GWW » Sun Mar 29, 2009 10:50 pm
bayman wrote:poohbear wrote:One thing that i fail to understand in regards to this matter is the underlying reason as to why a change was important. In all honesty has a change of name ever taken a team from second to bottom to top? I cannot for the life of me understand why the club would even bother thinking about it as it is obviously evident there are more pressing issues, ie. winning games....
well footscray has gone from a rabble to a competitive western bulldogs ?
by darley16 » Mon Mar 30, 2009 9:45 am
by Choccies » Mon Mar 30, 2009 10:09 am
by Hazydog » Mon Mar 30, 2009 10:26 am
by MightyEagles » Mon Mar 30, 2009 11:16 am
by am Bays » Thu Apr 02, 2009 4:31 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |