by stampy » Sun May 04, 2025 2:43 pm
by dedja » Sun May 04, 2025 5:09 pm
by locky801 » Sun May 04, 2025 5:19 pm
dedja wrote:Sturt up by 11 at 3/4 time, coming home with the breeze in the last.
Have controlled the match since 1/4 time, should win comfortably from here.
by dedja » Sun May 04, 2025 5:31 pm
locky801 wrote:dedja wrote:Sturt up by 11 at 3/4 time, coming home with the breeze in the last.
Have controlled the match since 1/4 time, should win comfortably from here.
Bays hit the front
by dedja » Sun May 04, 2025 5:37 pm
by PatowalongaPirate » Sun May 04, 2025 7:19 pm
by mots02 » Mon May 05, 2025 10:26 am
dedja wrote:Sturt up by 11 at 3/4 time, coming home with the breeze in the last.
Have controlled the match since 1/4 time, should win comfortably from here.
by dedja » Mon May 05, 2025 10:29 am
mots02 wrote:dedja wrote:Sturt up by 11 at 3/4 time, coming home with the breeze in the last.
Have controlled the match since 1/4 time, should win comfortably from here.
Breeze dropped off in the 4th…. After working so hard for 2 qtrs into it and short on the bench Sturt did really well to steady in the last 5 minutes and grab the win after the bays hit the front
A good game, although a lot of turnovers and the umpires were too whistle happy all day, particularly pulling a lot of frees for holding in marking contests.
by mots02 » Mon May 05, 2025 10:50 am
dedja wrote:mots02 wrote:dedja wrote:Sturt up by 11 at 3/4 time, coming home with the breeze in the last.
Have controlled the match since 1/4 time, should win comfortably from here.
Breeze dropped off in the 4th…. After working so hard for 2 qtrs into it and short on the bench Sturt did really well to steady in the last 5 minutes and grab the win after the bays hit the front
A good game, although a lot of turnovers and the umpires were too whistle happy all day, particularly pulling a lot of frees for holding in marking contests.
I thought the umps favoured the Bays![]()
Agree, the wind was less of a factor in the last. Even though they nearly did steal it, the Bays didn’t deserve to win so an appropriate result.
by Ronnie » Mon May 05, 2025 2:37 pm
by mots02 » Mon May 05, 2025 3:01 pm
Ronnie wrote:What a great advertisement that was for SANFL football. A great contest between 2 rivals played at a high level. Both sides have added some new elements to fairly settled sides. Was interesting to see Sturt keep a player on the field for the last quarter, Edmonds, who could hardly run, no doubt Mattner had his reasons but it does risk aggravating the injury.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |