by Dutchy » Mon Feb 11, 2013 9:28 pm
by RustyCage » Mon Feb 11, 2013 9:42 pm
by areaman » Mon Feb 11, 2013 10:22 pm
Aerie wrote:From what I can understand Eagles made a profit of $7217 from the Eagles Club ($360,000 donated to WWTFC) and the WWTFC made a profit of $154,420 making a combined profit of $161,637. Anyway, financial report here for those who can interpret better than me: http://www.wwtfc.com.au/wp-content/uplo ... Report.pdf
by UK Fan » Mon Feb 11, 2013 10:37 pm
Dutchy wrote:Just had a read and shows a very well managed footy club, congrats to all involved in these tough times.
Debt is up $700k but presume this has gone into the reno's of the club, noting that the Asset value has gone up a similar amount.
Membership and Match Day income up $50k (up 40%) is a great result, well done Phil H!
fester69 wrote: I'm full of "pish and wind" !!You can call me weak !!
MW wrote: Well call me a special asshole!.
Booney wrote: I'm a happy clapper **** stick.
by on the rails » Tue Feb 12, 2013 11:39 am
by Booney » Tue Feb 12, 2013 11:54 am
on the rails wrote:Not sure well done is correct if the profit result included a Govt. Grant otherwise would have been a loss?
by Dutchy » Tue Feb 12, 2013 12:18 pm
on the rails wrote:Not sure well done is correct if the profit result included a Govt. Grant otherwise would have been a loss?
by matt1 » Tue Feb 12, 2013 1:47 pm
Dutchy wrote:on the rails wrote:Not sure well done is correct if the profit result included a Govt. Grant otherwise would have been a loss?
There would be one off expenses that net this figure out.
by areaman » Tue Feb 12, 2013 2:58 pm
matt1 wrote:Dutchy wrote:on the rails wrote:Not sure well done is correct if the profit result included a Govt. Grant otherwise would have been a loss?
There would be one off expenses that net this figure out.
Correct Dutchy. I asked this question of a couple of Board members on the night and received that response. I don't think the Club wants its members to feel like they are going too well and get complacent. With more grant monies coming in 2013 it presents a good picture especially with Uby's commercial expertise in terms of increasing fundraising etc. Increase in debt is based on the re-development which will no doubt increase yield on game days. Well done to CD and the entire Board.
by csbowes » Fri Feb 15, 2013 11:35 pm
by am Bays » Sat Feb 16, 2013 9:08 am
by UK Fan » Sat Feb 16, 2013 9:55 am
am Bays wrote:One thing I hope the SANFL is strong on is that the Salary Cap isn't cut. For the comp to be vibrant and viable we need to attract and retain the best possible players into it. The average SANFL player works bloody hard for bigger all they need to be rewarded.
It is good that we attract the likes of Cachia, Allan, Hooper, Tuck etc to our League.
fester69 wrote: I'm full of "pish and wind" !!You can call me weak !!
MW wrote: Well call me a special asshole!.
Booney wrote: I'm a happy clapper **** stick.
by doggies4eva » Tue Feb 19, 2013 5:13 pm
by Big Phil » Tue Feb 19, 2013 5:49 pm
UK Fan wrote:am Bays wrote:One thing I hope the SANFL is strong on is that the Salary Cap isn't cut. For the comp to be vibrant and viable we need to attract and retain the best possible players into it. The average SANFL player works bloody hard for bigger all they need to be rewarded.
It is good that we attract the likes of Cachia, Allan, Hooper, Tuck etc to our League.
Well said!!!
by csbowes » Tue Feb 19, 2013 11:09 pm
by areaman » Thu Feb 21, 2013 11:03 am
csbowes wrote:Just for the record...
Sturt $220K loss - club view, based on increasing the value of poker machines
$450K loss - members view (from what was said on the night)
$650K loss - my view, as donations to pay off debt shouldn't be included when looking at how the club traded as an entity.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |