Ladders - Round 1

[scott]

[bayman]

scott, glenelg won the reserves, glenelg 20.7.127 def sturt 12.12.84

[Pseudo]

Thanks scott

[prowling panther]

Thanks Scott, nice to know where everyone is throughout the year, better than chasing the Advertiser through every page of the paper to find it.

Only 1 complaint, the font you use makes it very hard to read and a bit amaturish IMOO

[GWW]

Sporting Pulse also do a premiership table, although they're not always too quick to update it:

http://www.sportingpulse.com/comp_info. ... 0&a=LADDER

[MightyEagles]

Last nights games Eagles v South

U16s
South 2.4 3.7 5.9 10.12.72
Eagles 0.1 2.5 7.8 11.11.77

U18s
South 2.0 4.0 5.3 8.6.54
Eagles 2.1 7.3 14.8 21.12.138

Attendance - more cars then the Port Power game.
Who ever is going to the night game down south next week needs blankets (lots) and needs to build a fire to keep warm.

[scott]

Updated to include the missing results - thanks bayman & mightyeagles!

[redandblack]

Who would have thought at 3/4 time yesterday that Glenelg would be on top of the ladder 30 minutes or so later

[dedja]

Who would have thought at 3/4 time yesterday that Glenelg would be on top of the ladder 30 minutes or so later

[andyw]

dont mean to be picky but surely central, eagles and south should be equal bottom atm?

[scott]

All updated for the league, still awaiting scores from the other three grades.

[clanger]

north vs west under 16

west 3.5.23 6.6.42 9.10.64 10.11.71
north 1.4.10 1.7.13 5.10.40 12.12.84

[locky801]

north vs west under 16

west 3.5.23 6.6.42 9.10.64 10.11.71
north 1.4.10 1.7.13 5.10.40 12.12.84

Good comeback by the North boys, hopefully the Broady lads had a good game

[FlyingHigh]

Pretty incredible round of footy that the Eagles can be top with only a 15 point win.
Hopefully it augurs well for the season if North and West keep playing their new styles and South can sustain their efforts for the whole year.

[scott]

All updated.

I also acknowledge those who raised points about the team with the bye should be last and I agree, but this is only done this way so as not to affect several variables in the ladder on them unfairly such as 'avg ladder position' and '% time in top 5'.