Certainly did, but it doesn't mean there couldn't be another dominant side in the same era, we just didn't translate that into finals victories.
But to suggest winning 16 of 22 ( 2001 ) 18 of 22 ( 2002 ), 18 of 22 ( 2003 ) and 17 of 22 ( 2004 ) isn't dominating the competition is just anti-Port Adelaide jargon from regular Port bashers. Across 4 years to suggest winning 69 of 88 (nearly 80% win rate ) isn't "dominant" is just trolling. I'm used to it though, that's why it's great that there's a "friend" and "foe" function on here.
What it suggests is you choked when it mattered!
Do you get a medal for dominating the minor round these days?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McClelland_Trophy
What part of medal didn't you get?
They finished minor premiers we know that but they didn't finish it off.
You get a trophy, not a medal! :lol:
Yes, I know the trophy isn't an important one, yes ultimately success is based on premierships. Yes the original post was tongue in cheek.