Corona Man wrote:

mighty_tiger_79 wrote:Dogs off to a good start

Richmond are awful.

Armchair-esk predictions

dedja wrote:Congratulations Port, well deserved.

Luckily they took the magpies logo off of the jumper so it doesn't count.

MW wrote:

Vamos wrote:Burgess has nothing to do with it, they're finally seeing the fruits of Collective Minds.

Playing a very similar brand to 2017...gulp

Can you feel it.

The dogs brought the heat and we couldn’t go with them.

The problem with our game plan (defence first, generally low scoring) is that we always leave the opposition in it with a chance, well done to the dogs for stepping up and taking it.

If centrals can bring that sort of heat they will challenge the legs.

Booney wrote:

mots02 wrote:We don't need to scream for one when Port win, we know that one will always be posted - and historically far more quickly.

1st business day after the match. Errytime.

I guess when you make the rules, you can break the rules

Brodlach wrote:If watching it now, feels he has an RDO. First business day is then Wednesday

If he's home on an RDO, surely he can knock one out this afternoon?

And possibly also write the review?

Boon - Met your quota of one review per week somewhere else this week?! ;) :lol:


https://scontent.fadl3-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t39.30808-6/343736595_937917370860638_4325457191197262252_n.jpg?_nc_cat=106&ccb=1-7&_nc_sid=730e14&_nc_ohc=AnNrZVaSLkYAX96QgDa&_nc_ht=scontent.fadl3-1.fna&oh=00_AfBJ82-SODY5ffd8Q3o-gNE-AJ22-dm7wT2iDcO5M_Z_bg&oe=64512604

Booney wrote:I watched the game. It wasn't worth reviewing!

Since when has that stopped you?!

shoe boy wrote:

shoe boy wrote:Why is Southern sporting pulse the only league not showing APPS ?

Can anyone supply total APPS for each club.

Week 2 and still no transparency!

Maybe its gone the way of the need to field 5 Saturday teams?

Lightning McQueen wrote:

RB wrote:Gee unlucky for Holland, less than 12 months after being in the test squad.

Would be a decent short term fix for us

Nielsen is more likely to be chasing Bob Holland.

119…. You couldn’t make this up :lol:

https://www.foxsports.com.au/afl/afl-2023-carlton-draft-kane-cornes-return-highlights-match-for-moyston-willaura-football-club-100point-loss-reaction/news-story/5f08cb292c5b8258838b404a80836d83?fbclid=IwAR2S7qjfR4GAUMpHQ5U1t9NQeITXhFfJwLhcjnmahRsMjyJg82HhyRy7S7E&mibextid=Zxz2cZ

No SANFL in the AFL.... but this is pretty good from the Sturt socials team

https://www.facebook.com/share/v/9q5epit2WUE239b6/

Carlton don't win in Sydney. No reason why that will change tonight

I’m giving Carlton one last chance.
I’ve backed them most of the year but if they lose this I’m done with them

A full Armchair, change your logo to the suns style done with them?

Yep!
I’m going full Armchair

Never go full Armchair!

Did Matthew Hayden just have a stroke mid trying to say calibre?!

gadj1976 wrote:

tigerpie wrote:Maybe I looked at the footage with my black and white glasses on?

You think?

Thankfully the majority of people weren't wearing your glasses and saw fit to suspend him.

Black and white monocle

Well that’s made the crowd go quiet!

Lightning McQueen wrote:Managed to tune in for one ball

One ball, one wicket - Please tune in more often during the Ashes then…. You are the opposite of Armie.

Booney wrote:Where's the review?

First business day? A Friday morning review!

Carlton getting it done in the Armchair Derby.

The trophy is a replica of a torn up betting slip.

Booney wrote:Give every Australian one so we don't have to listen to Langer bang on about them. That'd be better.

Can we do the same with the Prison Bars?

Amazing Test Match and win for the Aussies.

There's some things the that Poms should like about Bazball but the thing that could work against them is the amount of time that they keep the opposition bowlers in the field.

In a congested series of back to back tests, the Poms have already bowled 64.2 overs more than the Aussies - if that continues it will begin to takes its toll across successive tests - or they'll have to rotate bowlers hard, and i'm not sure they've got the bowling depth to back that option.

Anderson with a 1/100 ish may have him struggling to keep his place also.
They'll keep him in though hoping he'll find his rythym in the second test.
Bazball v ozball hasn't worked out for them this test so it'll be interesting to see if there's any change to their second innings batting strategy.
They'll stick with it.

They've given is a cool, marketing name, they have to stick to brand now.

Good ol' Wally.


https://scontent.fadl3-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t39.30808-6/355278640_657725153047513_7447440167194424123_n.jpg?_nc_cat=111&ccb=1-7&_nc_sid=730e14&_nc_ohc=-BxZuRqb5soAX_FAzdr&_nc_ht=scontent.fadl3-1.fna&oh=00_AfDXMBKumqlVJFor0ed3k_qsj_E0m1eQsjJRAq9lmibuHA&oe=6497BD9A

locky801 wrote:

mots02 wrote:

Brodlach wrote:Houston ban upheld

The Vegemite jar analogy didn’t fly then?

Just remember though The toilet lid is part of the toilet…

Was it the same legal team that Warren Gary used?

Armchair expert wrote:Crows by how much this arvo? I'm thinking 4 goals.

If you were a broken clock, you’d still manage to predict the time wrong twice a day!

Brodlach wrote:Well done Collingwood

Don't be that guy.

Booney wrote:IGA Alberton*

I assume working in the fruit and veg dept?

RIP Matt Rendell

DOC wrote:Pope drops Warner. A very simple chance. I think Bairstow would have taken it.

Maybe dropped catches are part of Bazballs ‘keep it entertaining’ mantra?

Even the new guy is drinking the bazball bath water


https://scontent.fadl3-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t39.30808-6/357035477_605254335046012_8955992860860160121_n.jpg?_nc_cat=108&ccb=1-7&_nc_sid=8bfeb9&_nc_ohc=ljYF3Oy3jwQAX__JUD3&_nc_oc=AQn7evMlcCEFV_hi86fD31589LwSMwMAepe6U9wHxr6KRV3IwaTH5HMEaJIQDLTxxWc&_nc_ht=scontent.fadl3-1.fna&oh=00_AfAquT7oGy72fz-xEik6OrDbPBwgGa0173LzzasO8cIr8A&oe=64A1E687

Not bad from Titus.

"The English cricket team and its fans are having one of the most enjoyable meltdowns in sporting history following Jonny Bairstow forgetting he was in the middle of a cricket test at Lords and going for a little walk.

“We are deeply upset that a lawful action that we have tried many times ourselves has worked against us this time, which feels unfair,” said Professor of Ethics at Oxford University Stuart Broad.

“Given it’s out in black and white, we are now going to bang on about the Spirit of the Game, even though we ignore that too when it suits us.”

Marylebone Cricket Club member Simon Cuffleton-Smiggly-Wright said he was outraged the colonists had used better cricketing ability to defeat England.

“We didn’t conquer most of the globe by allowing the other side to fight fair,” said Cuffleton-Smiggly-Wright.

“And how are you meant to know all these rules? Who came up with them? They seem a bit all over the shop if you ask me. Need a good sorting out.”

Fellow member Geoffrey Beaumont said he would have confronted the Australian players physically in the members if years of inbreeding hadn’t made his bones like glass.

“It’s cheating, pure and simple. When you do something in the game that is within the laws, and the umpires rule it out, that’s cheating.”

“Still, it feels like again we should have won, so technically, we are 2-0 up.”

Australian fans have noted the England cricket team and its fans have successfully thrown their toys out of the cot and something Jonny Bairstow would struggle with."

Amazing Test Match and win for the Aussies.

There's some things the that Poms should like about Bazball but the thing that could work against them is the amount of time that they keep the opposition bowlers in the field.

In a congested series of back to back tests, the Poms have already bowled 64.2 overs more than the Aussies - if that continues it will begin to takes its toll across successive tests - or they'll have to rotate bowlers hard, and i'm not sure they've got the bowling depth to back that option.

Added to the 64 from first test, the Poms have now bowled 108 more overs than the Aussies across just 2 test matches.

Batting fast has its downside.

Booney wrote:2 days from holidays and 8 days of work to do in it.

Its not about the actual review, its the "spirit of the review" that counts.

MW wrote:

Jim05 wrote:We wasted too many good chances. Should be 4-5 goals up

Your pessimism knows no bounds lol
You own this game and will run out 10 goal winners

The poor old glass doesn't even get a chance to be half full!

Lightning McQueen wrote:Will we see a different stokes?

Whatcha talkin’ about Willis?

mighty_tiger_79 wrote:

Corona Man wrote:Mrs C went to the hairdresser.

Cut, colour, style and some “product”

$250…. WTF!

Mrs C can't question the next golf club investment

We all know that's not how this works!

I'm deeply concerned about the lack of a review last week and if there will be a review this week...
Or are we now just preparing for the review of the grand final victory?

Couldn't find a bar to watch it in Mandalika, Lombok!

Real Melbourne supporters in the snow fields mid season energy to this.

mighty_tiger_79 wrote:

Spargo wrote:

Armchair expert wrote:Cam McCarthy getting done for drink driving .414

I'd be dead at that level

FMD - That’s some sip!

Carey levels?

Sent from my SM-G781B using Tapatalk

Did he tell the Constable to put a d**k in his a**e?

Gets just about everything right.

Yeah nah.

Nah Yeah

Again. She gets most things right,

North will be relocating to Tassie
Clarko to coach the Suns
Clarko to coach GWS
Clarko waiting on the Tassie gig
Clarko to coach Essendon
Clarko won’t return to North
Throw enough darts…

That list reads like Norths war chest fishing

woodublieve12 wrote:ohn Longmire, the ultimate Bloods man
Our longest serving coach & tomorrow night he brings up his 300th game becoming the 25th person in AFL history to coach 300 games.

And the first person with the name Ohn.

The wildcard discussion is back on the table again.

We just don't need it. Fullstop, end of story. So it'll happen because the AFL thunk it up (via the NBA).

Off course it is.

Pretty much every idea the AFL has is from the american sports set up.

Will happen one day.....extra final = larger tv viewers over the season = increased tv deal.

= increased bonus for AFL Execs.... therefore, it will happen.

Brodlach wrote:Houston ban upheld

The Vegemite jar analogy didn’t fly then?

“At the centre of the planning for the future is the new headquarters,” John Olsen said.

“This is about cementing the Adelaide Football Club as a destination Club, rebuilding towards finals with an excellent culture and a great player and member facility."

Crom.

Did you get lost on the way to the Adelaide thread?

I’m in Melb and been at a work function, havent seen any the crows v Port game, hopefully someone will post a thorough post game review for me to read at a later day - maybe the first business day after the game as a suggestion.

I can't work out if Rachelle is shit, piss weak, over rated, needs to be taught a lesson or a young inexperienced guy, an upcoming star that's been harshly treated and hung out to dry by his club?

My confusion stems from people on here arguing on both sides of the debate for him!

MW wrote:Club has admitted fault, AFL clearly think they are at fault as does the wider football community... hold up must be the negotiation of the penalty and/or the fall guy. Davies or the doctor?

Is the outcome of this, what is also holding up the release of the Review?

Surely $119k was a more appropriate figure.

saintal wrote:Free entry for this one, sign of the times perhaps.

Bring out the tarps?

dedja wrote:

Brodlach wrote:Pickett retired at Richmond, the way they are going they will turnover half the list this offseason

Dimma’s timing was impeccable.

Lucky he got exhausted from coaching when he did.

Did I mention….. faaaaaaaaaarkkkkkkk!